jack22 said:Do you believe anyone Gian? Tomshardware is a great resource and reliable information. They have no reason to "skew" results. If you dont believe any resources, do them your self.
Not really; it was on Cnet here you can believe from that what you want but of all the sources on the Internet even you must believe something from CNet.Giancarlo said:Oh here we go again with the nonsense spree.. you need to be kept in line. AMD is growing its sizable lead. It has not been destroyed. Just accept the reality. Intel sold more EM64T processors then AMD sold 64-bit processors? You are so full of yourself. You need to study economics. Simply put, AMD sold more Athlon 64s then Intel will ever sell of the 6xx.
Shouldn't you really back that up with something or are they to take your word for it?Giancarlo said:The 6xx is junk.
Show us some where Sempron does as well against Celeron D as Celeron D did in those then?Giancarlo said:If you guys were smart you would not get the Celeron D. Tomshardware has the tendency of skewing results.
Show us that its not then? I am afterall awaiting in anticipation...Giancarlo said:There is no way in hell a Celeron D out of all processors is faster then a Sempron. By the way, Semprons will start to be released on the 939 chipset.
He believes himself Tomshardware is not biased; it only ever seems to squewer information you think is wrong. It doesn't seem to have a trend - AMD win what they win everywhere else, Intel win what they win everywhere else. If Giancarlo could show they squewer anything that wouild be interesting but I'm pretty sure he's forgotten how to actually prove anything.jack22 said:Do you believe anyone Gian? Tomshardware is a great resource and reliable information. They have no reason to "skew" results. If you dont believe any resources, do them your self.