A ASSEMBLER In Runtime Messages 477 Feb 7, 2006 #1 whats the difference between the venice/newcastle and winchester cores can anyone tell me please.
J jay8990 Daemon Poster Messages 838 Feb 7, 2006 #2 well i know the ddifference between venice and winchester! my old 3500 was a winchester and it was 130nm my new one is venice and its 90nm newcastle im not sure on!
well i know the ddifference between venice and winchester! my old 3500 was a winchester and it was 130nm my new one is venice and its 90nm newcastle im not sure on!
C Computergen1 BSOD Messages 3,175 Feb 7, 2006 #3 The venice is supposedly one of the better overclocking cores of 939 although winchester is good also.
The venice is supposedly one of the better overclocking cores of 939 although winchester is good also.
K kev In Runtime Messages 472 Feb 7, 2006 #4 Preslur 65nm HA HA (NOT A AMD vs INTEL THREAD!!!!!!!!!!!!) just saying
J jay8990 Daemon Poster Messages 838 Feb 7, 2006 #5 winchester chips run very hot.. at least mine did! didnt think it would be fantastic for overclocking (without a kick ass cooling system!)
winchester chips run very hot.. at least mine did! didnt think it would be fantastic for overclocking (without a kick ass cooling system!)
T TreeHugger In Runtime Messages 427 Feb 7, 2006 #6 venice= newest= 90nm = lower power consumption= less heat= better ocing= FASTER