Kage Golden Master Messages 13,873 Mar 31, 2008 #11 Same here. I mean, the technology for some sites, I guess, could exist, but the results would of course be purely mathematical based, on other scores this year, etc. Its when it started mentioning paper articles where I got a bit suspicious
Same here. I mean, the technology for some sites, I guess, could exist, but the results would of course be purely mathematical based, on other scores this year, etc. Its when it started mentioning paper articles where I got a bit suspicious
superman22x Golden Master Messages 7,904 Mar 31, 2008 #12 lol, but I have to say, its not as good as last years...
T Thrasher Daemon Poster Messages 878 Apr 1, 2008 #13 yeah that was fair weak but that's not unexpected from Google.
David Lindon Golden Master Messages 15,233 Apr 1, 2008 #14 Kage said: I'm guessing this is fake... It is April 1st Click to expand... Yeah. Does anyone remember pigeon ranking? That was the best one
Kage said: I'm guessing this is fake... It is April 1st Click to expand... Yeah. Does anyone remember pigeon ranking? That was the best one