More to refute...
No he didn't. In fact it was Bush Sr who started the first gulf war.
--> YEA that is what I said, he started the war. He gave the power to Saddam. To say he did not supply weapons, money and power to Saddam is an understament. You need to go back and read your history. There were some reviews of Saddam in Newsweek and it talked about how Bush Sr funded his regime, very interesting.
The fact that Bush Sr did not finish the gulf war was of concern. He should of finished it because he knew if he wasn't elected, his opponent Clinton would of never done it.
You do not start something you don't plan on finishing.
That's the most braindead response ever. How could you say something so utterly wrong? Why would Bush Sr give Saddam weapons during and after a war? He didn't. The Chinese were the biggest suppliers of weapons (the Russians no longer were because the Soviet Union was nearing collapse).
---> please review history. Yea he probably bought weapons from China but the investment to put him in power was the Bush Sr.
160 countries could not participate because of funding shortfalls, political differences and other reasons. 30 is still quite impressive.
---> Where do you get 160 from? Source?
This is getting so ridiculous. You have any idea what you are saying? Saudi Arabia has some elements that are funding terrorist attacks and is doing the best it can to deal with it. It takes time. North Korea well needs to be dealt with. I think the Chinese can flex their muscles there and should. And the Iranians will be facing an internal revolution again.
---> So you do agree that Saudi Arabia is funding terrorist? Then doesn't that just go against Bush's statement that he'll stop sources of terror? I believe Bush needs to stop accepting their money and then deal with all the countries who have WMD.