Generally I don't; but if I don't think you're right of course I do. Its only natural and generally our debates are based on opinion and neither of ours are going to change but however wins - even if it is you all the time [cusses
] in the debate I would generally hope those who take the time to read it and don't just think oh bloody hell its Giancarlo and Lord Kalthorn at it again will learn something - or indeed join in. As far as I can tell its impossible to be pissy in text.
You should do that then; we've all seen you're good at it. What members think of you is important basically; and how you react to members is important. You pushed on Bluto over and over in that sense; his reaction to members was not often pleasant; and that's why we banned him, if your reaction to members is no better why are you any better? The problems arise from that and most of our members do not have the bloated sense of self-respect and personality that we have and some others have here - they cannot take your insults of them lightly and throw debate back at you without resorting to swearing or flaming.
I'm still not sure of your definition of a Moderator... but whatever we have already worked out I am a Moderator - and how that affects you I do not know because I in respect to you have never used Moderator powers to do anything.
I'm not sure how you cannot see the comparisons between yourself and Bluto; in a Forum sense not in a belief sense of course.
I think we should know how many Moderators you're after David?