Go Back   Computer Forums > Welcome To Computer Forums .org > Social Lounge | Off Topic
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 05-07-2005, 04:35 PM   #141
Daemon Poster
 
connchri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 1,019
Send a message via MSN to connchri
Default Re: Weapon Prefrence

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giancarlo
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/nation...lug=US%20China

"WASHINGTON -- President Bush shared concerns with Chinese President Hu Jintao on Thursday about North Korea's nuclear weapons program and refusal to resume six-nation talks, a White House spokesman said.

By phone, the two leaders also discussed the recent visits to China by Taiwanese opposition leaders, said presidential press secretary Scott McClellan."

In fact we have close ties to the Chinese as it is. We have had since Deng Xiaoping. You also failed to mention that Ju Hintao.. the new incoming Chinese leader is more liberal then previous leaders. Our upcoming invasion of North Korea? That's rich. Really rich.

Somebody tells me you need to get out of the 1950s and to leave the rhetoric behind. It'll help your argument. At least I'm not the one defending an old tank design based on the old T-55 chassis.
If you actually read that whole article, it says that USA and China are not happy with NKorea, but also that China is not too happy with Taiwan. USA is the reason why China does not have Taiwan, and that is the reason why China is not happy with them! Tell me, what do you think SKorea will do once they have proof that NKorea did stop there Nuclear Power stations for nuclear bomb fuel? I think the US will intervine a bit more, don't you think? China wants Taiwan, and if it wasn't for the US Fleet in the Tiawan straight, they would have invaded it by now.

Your tank? blah, read my previous post.
__________________

__________________
Delta: "What's wrong Chris?? Chris: "I miss my old Cyrix"
connchri is offline  
Old 05-07-2005, 04:37 PM   #142
BSOD
 
Giancarlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,788
Send a message via AIM to Giancarlo
Default Re: Weapon Prefrence

The US government actually told Taiwan to cool it as far as independence is concerned.

The South Korean Military is also something not to be dealt with. The Chinese know they are ages ahead of them.
__________________

Giancarlo is offline  
Old 05-07-2005, 04:41 PM   #143
Daemon Poster
 
connchri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 1,019
Send a message via MSN to connchri
Default Re: Weapon Prefrence

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giancarlo

You are the one who can't look at your own sources. First off, the Type 98 is not a T-98. It is based on the T-72, which is inturned baseed on the ancient T-55 chassis.

I didn't insult myself either. I'm the one posting reputable sources.
Resembles a T-72 hull, read through and understand what else it says, and throughout the other article I postest. It's a NEW hull. It's nothing to do with the T-72. It resembles it, but guess what, the look of my old P2 400 rig resembled the look of my old 486, but still different. (AT to ATX) It's a new hull design.

I take it you are now aggreeing that the "Laser weapon" is now real and that China is infact modernising it military? Oh, and whats wrong with my sources?
__________________
Delta: "What's wrong Chris?? Chris: "I miss my old Cyrix"
connchri is offline  
Old 05-07-2005, 04:42 PM   #144
BSOD
 
Giancarlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,788
Send a message via AIM to Giancarlo
Default Re: Weapon Prefrence

Quote:
Originally Posted by connchri
Resembles a T-72 hull, read through and understand what else it says, and throughout the other article I postest. It's a NEW hull. It's nothing to do with the T-72. It resembles it, but guess what, the look of my old P2 400 rig resembled the look of my old 486, but still different. (AT to ATX) It's a new hull design.

I take it you are now aggreeing that the "Laser weapon" is now real and that China is infact modernising it military? Oh, and whats wrong with my sources?
You read through your own source. It is based on the design and it is a bad design. This isn't a new hull really. It basically takes the old one. There is no "laser weapon" as some want to put it. It is a tracking system that has existed for ages, even in Russia.

Also as far as North Korea is concerned, your suggestions the US would invade is very rich and laughable.

You need to take some courses I think. Both in military affairs and politics.
Giancarlo is offline  
Old 05-07-2005, 04:43 PM   #145
Daemon Poster
 
connchri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 1,019
Send a message via MSN to connchri
Default Re: Weapon Prefrence

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giancarlo
The US government actually told Taiwan to cool it as far as independence is concerned.

The South Korean Military is also something not to be dealt with. The Chinese know they are ages ahead of them.
OMG! I never said anything about sorting out the SKoreans. I'm meaning them, being more democratic and ties to the US will be worried about the nuclear weapons being stockpiled in NKorea, and will probably end up asking for the US to step in. Why would NKorea stockpile Nukes for no reason? I personally think they hope to regain SKorea again!
__________________
Delta: "What's wrong Chris?? Chris: "I miss my old Cyrix"
connchri is offline  
Old 05-07-2005, 04:45 PM   #146
BSOD
 
Giancarlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,788
Send a message via AIM to Giancarlo
Default Re: Weapon Prefrence

Quote:
Originally Posted by connchri
OMG! I never said anything about sorting out the SKoreans. I'm meaning them, being more democratic and ties to the US will be worried about the nuclear weapons being stockpiled in NKorea, and will probably end up asking for the US to step in. Why would NKorea stockpile Nukes for no reason? I personally think they hope to regain SKorea again!
The US already has strong ties with the Chinese. Face it dude. We are helping them with their economy and we are giving them the boom. We are investing in their country. They would not attack us or Taiwan. It is against their interests.

North Korea won't last much longer based on how much it spends on its military. Some 65% of its GDP.
Giancarlo is offline  
Old 05-07-2005, 04:46 PM   #147
Daemon Poster
 
connchri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 1,019
Send a message via MSN to connchri
Default Re: Weapon Prefrence

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giancarlo
You read through your own source. It is based on the design and it is a bad design. This isn't a new hull really. It basically takes the old one. There is no "laser weapon" as some want to put it. It is a tracking system that has existed for ages, even in Russia.

Also as far as North Korea is concerned, your suggestions the US would invade is very rich and laughable.

You need to take some courses I think. Both in military affairs and politics.

What do you think this means??-

"While the engagement procedure of the Type 98's self-defense laser is unknown, published reports concerning similar weapons describe a procedure where the laser weapon would first use a low-powered beam to locate the optics of the enemy weapon. Once the enemy weapon was located, the power level of the laser would be immediately and dramatically increased. Such an attack would disable the guidance optics of the enemy weapon and/or damage the eyesight of the enemy gunner."
__________________
Delta: "What's wrong Chris?? Chris: "I miss my old Cyrix"
connchri is offline  
Old 05-07-2005, 04:47 PM   #148
BSOD
 
Giancarlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,788
Send a message via AIM to Giancarlo
Default Re: Weapon Prefrence

Quote:
Originally Posted by connchri
What do you think this means??-

"While the engagement procedure of the Type 98's self-defense laser is unknown, published reports concerning similar weapons describe a procedure where the laser weapon would first use a low-powered beam to locate the optics of the enemy weapon. Once the enemy weapon was located, the power level of the laser would be immediately and dramatically increased. Such an attack would disable the guidance optics of the enemy weapon and/or damage the eyesight of the enemy gunner."
This I think is total bullshit. I'm sorry. We aren't living in James Bond 007 world here.
Giancarlo is offline  
Old 05-07-2005, 04:48 PM   #149
Daemon Poster
 
connchri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 1,019
Send a message via MSN to connchri
Default Re: Weapon Prefrence

Quote:
Originally Posted by Giancarlo
The US already has strong ties with the Chinese. Face it dude. We are helping them with their economy and we are giving them the boom. We are investing in their country. They would not attack us or Taiwan. It is against their interests.

North Korea won't last much longer based on how much it spends on its military. Some 65% of its GDP.
Doesn't stop the NKoreans from causing mehem though, does it. If there countries economy does collapse, what have they go to loose in a war? And if they were not planning anything, why the 65% GDP being spent on military?
__________________
Delta: "What's wrong Chris?? Chris: "I miss my old Cyrix"
connchri is offline  
Old 05-07-2005, 04:49 PM   #150
BSOD
 
Giancarlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,788
Send a message via AIM to Giancarlo
Default Re: Weapon Prefrence

Quote:
Originally Posted by connchri
Doesn't stop the NKoreans from causing mehem though, does it. If there countries economy does collapse, what have they go to loose in a war? And if they were not planning anything, why the 65% GDP being spent on military?
Argumentative and emotional. Kim Jong Il is a megalomaniac.
__________________

Giancarlo is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0