test please ignore

[FuRgy]

Well, Netuser could just edit his post

 

[root]

it displays an image map that could be used for navigation.

this line

<img src="http://img93.exs.cx/img93/2584/spider.png" usemap="#spider" alt="" style="border-style:none" />
[/img]

links to an image, so if html were enabled an image would be shown.
these lines[code]<map id="spider" name="spider">
<area shape="rect" coords="2,39,93,68" href="http://stp.computercentral.uni.cc/" title="" />
<area shape="rect" coords="56,70,133,100" href="http://pcforums.uni.cc/" title="" />
<area shape="rect" coords="134,74,235,104" href="http://computercentral.uni.cc/" title="" />
<area shape="rect" coords="250,65,347,97" href="http://watchmypc.tk/" title="" />
<area shape="rect" coords="290,22,382,55" href="http://www.randomwebsite.com/cgi-bin/random15.pl" title="" />
<area shape="rect" coords="99,27,234,69" href="http://netuser.uni.cc/" title="" />
<area shape="default" nohref="nohref" alt="" />
</map>

draw trasnparant recangular hyperlink boxes...


there are several problems with this.

1, HTML is not enabled
2, to display an image you have to use BB tags [ img ] [ /img ]
3, the html wasn't in it's own element or div, ss the hyperlink map wuold have been over the computer forums logo.

If html were enabled it'd be a nice way to break a forum however, you make a post link this and draw rectalngular links over all the buttons to generate click through revenue!

 

[135791]

there we go thats what it was

basically being spam

 

[airiox]

yeah a new sig that has all his sites linked up. Sort of like thought bubbles.

 

[135791]

notice how he has nothing more to say on this

 

[crazyman143]

hmmm...
spam?
sigs are not meant for spam... there meant for complaining about netscape!

 

[rakedog]

Netscape isn't as bad as IE..

 

[airiox]

notice how he has nothing more to say on this

he edited his first post with an explanation.

 

[root]

but surely he realised that there are different rules for the sigs? (BB code is allowed in posts but not in sigs,) Surely if it were a sig test he should have entered the code into the sig box?

 

[crazyman143]

Netscape isn't as bad as IE..

I havn't had much of a problem with IE, I'd have to say that netscape is much worse.