Smart_Guy
Fully Optimized
- Messages
- 4,856
- Location
- Saudi Arabia
No dude. Don't need to, lots of pron online.
Lucky you. It's all blocked in this country.
I didn't say I do watch pr0n online, mind you... ehhm
No dude. Don't need to, lots of pron online.
After the "8 core FX" bust, I'll think long and hard before buying AMD again.And.... as much as I'm erking not to agree... I can say that in all my years, I've had more trouble with AMD rigs than Intel. I'm a die hard AMD fan and they just keep letting me down and it's making me sad.
After the "8 core FX" bust, I'll think long and hard before buying AMD again.
Now that's a funny thing about it. A fella on a forum somewhere I forgot which tested that 8 cores. He said that in a way they are 8 cores because he was able to isolate each core and test its performance.
You can't do that with a 4 core with HTT as there's only 4 cores.
Now you can take that with a grain of salt because I don't know wether to believe him or not but he's known to be an electronic expert.
There are 8 physical cores, each with it's own L1 cache, but they work in pairs, sharing the FPU.
When the CPU is performing integer calculations, it performs as 2 normal cores. When doing floating point, it performs as one. That's why the no one buys 8350s for video editing.In terms of performance, how does this compare with hyperthreading? I imagine that it would produce somewhat similar results—excellent in some areas, mediocre in others.
When the CPU is performing integer calculations, it performs as 2 normal cores. When doing floating point, it performs as one. That's why the no one buys 8350s for video editing.