|
|
#1 |
|
Fully Optimized
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,974
|
People are all Pro-facebook and anti-wikileaks it seems. I'm not promoting illegal activity, I just don't see how exposing corporate blunders is conceivably more devious than selling 600 million people's details to said corporations
__________________
Customised Packard-Bell iPower:- AMD Athlon X2 4600+, 2GB DDR, 2x7600GT (SLI) Steam+XBL: ReincarnHATE925, Blizzard RealID: Ibanezjunkie94@hotmail.co.uk |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Site Team
|
Because one we gave our info to freely and knowingly. The other published military information potentially putting us in danger.
__________________
“Adults are just obsolete children and the hell with them.” - Dr. Suess |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Site Team
|
This. I agreed to a EULA with facebook saying they could do whatever they wanted. Corporations did not sign a EULA to the founder of wikilinks saying he could give away their secrets.
__________________
"as a fanboy i refuse to admit it and will pull countless things out of my butt to disprove it" Team Thelegorm! Total Kills: 21 (i iz in uor profile, editsing your sigz) |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Site Team
|
Have you all seen the Humancentipad Southpark episode? I recommend it.
__________________
“Adults are just obsolete children and the hell with them.” - Dr. Suess |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Site Team
|
Such a funny episode, and yet so true!
__________________
"as a fanboy i refuse to admit it and will pull countless things out of my butt to disprove it" Team Thelegorm! Total Kills: 21 (i iz in uor profile, editsing your sigz) |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
ಠ_ಠ
Join Date: May 2009
Location: 'Murica!
Posts: 9,037
|
People don't seem to understand that Wikileaks did nothing illegal. They are considered a media organization, and are protected under the first amendment. The government ignored this and made them out to be the villain, repeatedly stating that they were breaking the law and attempting to censor them, though I don't recall them ever stating which law was being broken. I did a bit of research on this a while back, and found a supreme court precedent that ruled that the media is able to hold and release classified information, as long as they didn't do anything illegal to obtain it. New York Times Co. v. United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia I find it ridiculous that this ruling was completely ignored by both the government and the media, despite the fact that it was a pretty much identical case. All I ever saw on the news was people arguing over whether or not it was morally okay, like that somehow changes the laws in place.
__________________
Desktop: PII 955, 4GB DDR3 1333, M4A79T, 250GB 7200.10, HD 5770, 3x HG281D Laptop: Q9000, 4GB DDR3, DV7 mb, 40GB Hitachi, HD 4650M, 23" AOC LED backlit panel Netbook: Pink ASUS 1005HAB, Atom N270, 1GB DDR2, 160GB HDD, Intel 945G, 63 Whr battery |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|