From what i have read from you, I dont think you really are a troll. To me, your just a fanboy.
Your flaming/trolling by provoking people on a PC
forum that an 360 is better than PC graphics wise, and just pulling BS out of your ass to cover it.
Originally Posted by jarlmaster47
I meant fps as in frames per second. The 360 and the PS3 for that matter can run any game on what would be considered max settings with extremely high fps that never dip below even 200 probably. Think about it. The 360 20 gb hard drive edition starts at about 240 dollars! The performance you get with it is amazing!! To get a PC that can match you would need to spend up to 2500 dollars! PC's may be upgradeable but for a dedicated gaming machine that is cheap the 360 is the answer!
360 does not win with FPS (Frames Per Second), Theres lots of games that dips down to 15FPS (like Last Remnant), you just dont know because theres no frame counter. With the 360, you cant tune down the graphics to make the game run better, while with PC, you can. The 360 does NOT
go up to 200FPS, the max it goes is 60FPS, and rarely any game out there on the 360 stays 60FPS average, most games run at average of 30FPS.
My PC is about $500 when I have built it, and it run games I play on Max just fine. The only game you need really good specs is Crysis, which beats any console games graphics wise.
Seriously, get your facts straight and stop BS'ing.
Oh yeah, and your only counting the system. You forgot to add the price of an HDTV for the consoles just to READ
the damn texts.
Seriously, why does people overlook the HDTV? your saying like you can just go out, and get an console, and expect to play right out of the box without hooking it up anything besides the power.
So a console costs more in the end.