Originally Posted by Rudster816
it was a post with JUST a pic of a tomato on it
also i guess ill clear things up since my post is so "confusing"
i was banned for 7 days for "posting too many argumentitive threads that were locked", in other words, i was re posting threads that got locked before, even though...
1st one) locked for turning in to a joke thread
2nd one) locked because mark said i was wrong, than locked it and gave no reason
3rd one) locked at my request so i could make a new thread(the 4th one)
4th one) was locked and i was banned for "re posting locked threads" even though none were locked because of the subject.
yes, you were banned for continually re-starting locked threads. they were all locked for the subject.
the subject was that people should have a place to vent and argue at each other. and that all rules could be broken in that thread, and you could say whatever you liked to who ever you liked.
it's like a forums rule that doesn't even need to be written, if a thread is locked it means the subject is closed, you might get away with re-opening it, but if the same sort of subject is closed twice then there is definitely no need for a third or fourth thread.
I still stand by that decision. and I'd do it again.
I thought about banning you, but I didn't because I was annoyed that day and thought it'd be better to leave it to someone else, rather than be unnecessarily harsh because I was pissed with entirely unconnected things at the time.
nine times out of ten, unless it's obvious why someone is banned, (like a spammer or something), I'll post a reason in public for banning someone, just because it saves on the threads like this, and warns others not to do whatever that person has just done.