Go Back   Computer Forums > Welcome To Computer Forums .org > Social Lounge | Off Topic
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 11-14-2006, 05:12 PM   #21
Site Team
 
David Lindon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 15,233
Default Re: Federline Threatens Britney With Honeymoon Sex Tapes

Didn't she have a prenup done anyway?
__________________

David Lindon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006, 05:40 PM   #22
Daemon Poster
 
Lac3y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,110
Send a message via MSN to Lac3y
Default Re: Federline Threatens Britney With Honeymoon Sex Tapes

Meh, I say release them. I won't be complaining, I have no sympathy for her.
__________________

__________________
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 @ 3.7GHz
4GB OCZ PC-6400 RAM
Samsung Spinpoint 1TB HDD
ATI Radeon HD4890 with VoltageTweak
OCZ Stealth XStream 600w PSU
Lac3y is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006, 06:38 PM   #23
Fully Optimized
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,276
Default Re: Federline Threatens Britney With Honeymoon Sex Tapes

lol... what a bunch of silly folk. i'm not sure if anyone really deserves what britney is getting or might get, but... hey.. it's what you get for getting involved with an idiot like that federline guy.
__________________
| AMD 3800+ X2 Dual Core Processor | ASUS A8N-e nF4 Ultra | Hitachi Deskstar 250gb 3.0 gb/s | 1gb Corsair Value RAM 2x512 | eVGA geforce 6800GS | sound blaster live! 24-bit | NZXT Trinity Classic chassis | OCZ GameXStream OCZ700GXSSLI PSU |
I was there. In the networking forum for the first time, and it was because.. of 341
kchi55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006, 06:43 PM   #24
Golden Master
 
DJ-CHRIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 5,203
Send a message via AIM to DJ-CHRIS Send a message via MSN to DJ-CHRIS Send a message via Yahoo to DJ-CHRIS
Default Re: Federline Threatens Britney With Honeymoon Sex Tapes

Quote:
Originally Posted by joxley1990
I hope those damned tapes are released..haha..

No I do think that is a little harsh, but at the same time, why make them?
It's sexually exciting, except for what can happen.
DJ-CHRIS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006, 06:44 PM   #25
Golden Master
 
ArrizX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,073
Send a message via MSN to ArrizX
Default Re: Federline Threatens Britney With Honeymoon Sex Tapes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lac3y
Meh, I say release them. I won't be complaining, I have no sympathy for her.
If they get released then the public suffers LOL
__________________
. ()()()()
./l ,[_\_\ ],
l---L – ()lllllll()-
()_) ()_)--o-)_)
ArrizX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006, 11:21 PM   #26
Golden Master
 
alvino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 19,967
Send a message via AIM to alvino
Default Re: Federline Threatens Britney With Honeymoon Sex Tapes

I say do it. Not because it's the right thing to do, but I hate Britney Spears and I'd like to see her ass get owned.
alvino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006, 11:34 PM   #27
Daemon Poster
 
allenn812's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 935
Default Re: Federline Threatens Britney With Honeymoon Sex Tapes

Release Them! Please!
__________________
Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 Oc'd to 2.9ghz
ECS 570 SLIT Motherboard
2 gig of Corsair ddr2 677
Western Digital 250 Gig HD
Evga 8800GTS 640mb Oc'd to 615/1000
allenn812 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2006, 11:52 PM   #28
Golden Master
 
alvino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 19,967
Send a message via AIM to alvino
Default Re: Federline Threatens Britney With Honeymoon Sex Tapes

I wouldn't watch them. I just want to see her get owned.

However, I don't hate her as much as I do Anna Nicole Smith. She deserves to be shot and hung in shame. She marries the multimillionaire J. Howard Marshall and he was 63 years her senior. 14 months after they were married Marshall died and she engaged in a legal lawsuit over Marshall's estate with E. Pierce Marshall over her late husband's $1.6 Billion estate.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
Marshall v. Marshall, U.S., 126 S.Ct. 1735 (2006)
Within weeks after J. Howard's death on August 4, 1995, Smith squared off against his son, E. Pierce Marshall, for half of her late husband's US$1.6 billion estate. Smith joined forces with J. Howard's other son, James Howard Marshall III, whom the elder Howard had disowned. Both claimed J. Howard verbally promised substantial gifts; like Smith, Howard III was formally left out of J. Howard's will, which he updated weeks after their marriage.[2] The case has gone on for more than a decade, producing a highly publicized court battle in Texas and several judicial decisions that have gone both for and against Smith in that time.

In 1995 the executor of Howard's estate initiated probate proceedings in Louisiana state court, but the Louisiana court dismissed the proceeding for lack of jurisdiction. In Jan. 1996 the executor then initiated proceedings in Texas state probate court. At the same time, Smith initiated federal bankruptcy proceedings in California (where she was living), alleging that Pierce's interference with a trust that Howard had promised her was preventing her from meeting financial obligations. Pierce challenged Smith's assertions in the bankruptcy proceeding and alleged that such assertions amounted to defamation. The bankruptcy court found that Pierce had indeed interfered with a trust Howard intended to give to Smith, and awarded Smith $449 million (i.e., entered a verdict against Pierce in the amount of $449 million). At the same time, Smith made the same tortious interference claim in the probate proceeding still ongoing in Texas state court, but dropped the claim upon the federal bankruptcy court's decision. Without hearing the tort claim, the jury in the Texas state probate court ruled that Howard's will was valid (recall that Smith was not mentioned in the will, and in fact was not challenging the will; she was asserting that Pierce was interfering with a gift that Howard left Smith, separate from his will). Pierce then sought United States district court review of the Bankruptcy court decision. Pierce argued that the federal bankruptcy court did not have jurisdiction over the case based on the so-called "probate exception," a common law theory that says a federal court that otherwise has proper jurisdiction over a case should decline to exercise it in cases dealing with probate-related matters. The district court found that the exception did not reach Smith's case, because her complaint did not regard Howard's will and therefore was not a probate matter; rather it was a claim in tort, specifically that Pierce had tortiously interfered with a gift that Howard intended to give to Smith. [Compare tort and probate]. The district court affirmed the bankruptcy court's findings, but lowered the damage award. However, based on the district court's finding of Pierce's "willfullness, maliciousness, and fraud," it still awarded Smith roughly $44 million in compensatory damages and roughly the same amount in punitive damages. Pierce then appealed the decision to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Ninth Circuit overruled the District Court, holding that the district court should have applied the probate exception (i.e., declined to take jurisdiction of the case). Smith appealed, and the U.S. Supreme Court decided in September of 2005 to hear the appeal of that decision. The Bush Administration subsequently directed the Solicitor General to intercede on Smith's behalf out of an interest in the federal court jurisdictional question.[3] After months of waiting, Smith and her step-son Pierce learned of the Supreme Court's decision on May 1, 2006. The justices unanimously decided in favor of Smith. Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote the majority opinion, stating that the 9th Circuit read the "probate exception" too broadly. (See Marshall v. Marshall.) It is expected that the long-running legal drama will not end any time soon, because many remaining issues need to be decided upon remand. On June 20, 2006, E. Pierce Marshall died at the age of 67 after an infection. [Citation: Marshall v. Marshall, __ U.S. __, 126 S.Ct. 1735 (2006)]

The case has been remanded to the 9th Circuit to adjudicate the remaining appellate issues not previously reached.
It's shameful seeing her marry this 89 year old man just for the money. She wasn't even there when he died!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
Marriage to Marshall
Smith married her second husband, oil billionaire J. Howard Marshall, on June 27, 1994. She was 26; he was 89. According to an E! profile, Smith had other relationships and was generally indifferent to Marshall, with whom she never lived. Her alleged romantic interests included bodybuilder Clay Spires, Scott Baio, John Travolta's nephew Rikki, radio personality Kristy Lee and real estate mogul Jonathan McManus. J. Howard's nurse told E! that Smith never visited him as his condition became terminal, and was not with him when he died. In contrast to E!'s reports, Smith has steadfastly maintained—on her reality TV show, in court appearances, in interviews, and so on—that she loved Marshall greatly, and was devastated by his death.
Haha...devastated by his death...yeah right.
alvino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2006, 02:48 AM   #29
Fully Optimized
 
Đ88's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,775
Send a message via MSN to Đ88
Default Re: Federline Threatens Britney With Honeymoon Sex Tapes

As much as I think (or so used to think) Britney is hot, I just don't want to see her having sex with that douche bag K-Fed. I don't like that guy and I think he is a prick for freeloading on Britney's cash and having got to screw her and now this is all the thanks he has for it all? Maybe if he wasn't such a dumbass he'd still be with her and happy in his own little simple world.
__________________
Killing under the cloak of war is no different than murder

Kein Alkohol ist auch keine Lösung!
Đ88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2006, 03:10 AM   #30
Golden Master
 
alvino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 19,967
Send a message via AIM to alvino
Default Re: Federline Threatens Britney With Honeymoon Sex Tapes

I wouldn't want to see the tape either. I just don't like Britney. I could care less about the guy though.
__________________

alvino is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0