Fast or Not Fast

[jac006]

You haven't seen my benchmarks, LK. With the water cooling I've put in, I've been at 2.6ghz and back, no problem, running at that speed for 72 hours, using pc-burn in. Plus, my 64-bit pays off, or it will, especially when I did a benchmark with linux using my cpu and my friend's 660. Yeah. But yeah.

 

[| LordNikon |]

i was going to go for there water cooling but i do not trust it one bit at all a little leek and boom there goes the computer so im staying with the normal fans lol

 

[Lord Kalthorn]

You haven't seen my benchmarks, LK. With the water cooling I've put in, I've been at 2.6ghz and back, no problem, running at that speed for 72 hours, using pc-burn in. Plus, my 64-bit pays off, or it will, especially when I did a benchmark with linux using my cpu and my friend's 660. Yeah. But yeah.

Ah yes but if you're going to be comparing the 660 against that, you would have to raise it by the same percentage; to 4.2Ghz maybe 4.4Ghz In which case, you and I both know, it would whoop your one's arse