I don't know either...
I'm not sure how everyone else feels about this, (in terms of moderators/admin)...
would it be fine to re-open the thread if the title were changed to.
"Conspiricy theories regarding 9/11 (don't post if you are offended)."
I think that's fair warning, both about the subject and the common sense that should be employed in such a thread.
I don't think that just because a few (minority) have a problem with a threads content that it should be locked, I thikn that there should be something happened in that thread to make it worth of being locked.
that said, these 9/11 consipricy theories are pretty much flame bait, we all know it. so I'm sitting on the fence a little. I support being able to talk about whatever you like. but I also support the fact that a moderator can will and should close a post that will only generate arguments.
I didn’t fight my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian…
Im sick of people saying 'dont waste paper'. If trees wanted to live, they'd all carry guns.
"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; The inherent vice of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."