Go Back   Computer Forums > Welcome To Computer Forums .org > Social Lounge | Off Topic
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 02-25-2006, 04:40 AM   #1
Fully Optimized
 
Nik00117's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,025
Send a message via AIM to Nik00117 Send a message via MSN to Nik00117 Send a message via Yahoo to Nik00117
Default Civil War

What do you think we should do if Iraq were to break into civil war? Myself i'd say we'd move out of the country and take a netural stance on the war and tell the Iraqi poeple its a internal issue, fight it out winner takes all. THere is a lot of fears of civil war in Iraq right now. I feel we should let it happen, the government will sort itself out.
__________________

__________________
Main Rig: I7 920 CPU, 6 Gigs ram 5870 GPU
M17X Laptop 2.8 Ghz Dual Core, 4870 Radeon
Nik00117 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2006, 05:33 AM   #2
In Runtime
 
Conspirate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 218
Default Re: Civil War

I agree that a Civil War should not have any interference. During the Civil War in America, the Union (who was favored) was worried that British or French troops would ally with the Confederacy. If that HAD happened, the entire outcome of the globe would be different.

Unfortunetely, with all the "progress" in Iraq, it's just going to become more screwed up than it is now, which is already more screwed up then it was before the "liberation". If one tribe were to conquer the other (Sunni or Shiite), the "government" would sort itself out. However, that would result in genocide.

And a civil war has been going on in Iraq for a few years now; only after the bombing of the holiest mosque did it get any media play.

Peace sells... but who's buying.
__________________

Conspirate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2006, 01:07 PM   #3
Fully Optimized
 
Nik00117's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,025
Send a message via AIM to Nik00117 Send a message via MSN to Nik00117 Send a message via Yahoo to Nik00117
Default Re: Civil War

I agree, one thing we should not interfer with is civil war. If it where to accor we tell the Iraqi government we will not fight for them or aganist them and this is there problem. And the british and such did help the South a lot. The british had economic intersets in the south especially georgia. They wanted there cotton, georgia produced teh most. So they would help behind the scenes but it really did little to no good. Thiink we will take the stance. As one ugy said from the military if it erupts in a large scale civil war our only duties will be to ensure outside forgein countries do not interfer.
__________________
Main Rig: I7 920 CPU, 6 Gigs ram 5870 GPU
M17X Laptop 2.8 Ghz Dual Core, 4870 Radeon
Nik00117 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2006, 03:51 PM   #4
Daemon Poster
 
RewtGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 595
Send a message via AIM to RewtGuy
Default Re: Civil War

Maybe we should look at the intrests of both sides though. What if the winner of the civil war will terrorize neighboring countries and threaten us by breeding, raising, and training terrorists and equiping them to do things against other countries. We would just have to go in there again and take the leader out. So I think it's in our best intrest to make sure everything we worked for so far wouldn't be in jepoardy. Otherwise what did those men die in the desert for? So someone else can take the country and do the same thing?
__________________
Windows: A thirty-two bit extension and GUI shell to a sixteen bit patch to an eight bit operating system originally coded for a four bit microprocessor and sold by a two-bit company that can't stand one bit of competition.
RewtGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2006, 04:20 PM   #5
Fully Optimized
 
Nik00117's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,025
Send a message via AIM to Nik00117 Send a message via MSN to Nik00117 Send a message via Yahoo to Nik00117
Default Re: Civil War

Quote:
Maybe we should look at the intrests of both sides though. What if the winner of the civil war will terrorize neighboring countries and threaten us by breeding, raising, and training terrorists and equiping them to do things against other countries. We would just have to go in there again and take the leader out. So I think it's in our best intrest to make sure everything we worked for so far wouldn't be in jepoardy. Otherwise what did those men die in the desert for? So someone else can take the country and do the same thing?
Who said they'd do that. Personnally I could see the kurds staying out but the sintes and sunies just want there part of the government. Don't see why they don't just spiult the country up into 3. Kurds, Sunnies, Sunities. Don't think we should get involed. I mean I personnally would make heavy use of speacial forces if I were bush if that would come to pass. See no reason to invade a country or such when your america. Send in a group of rangers take out the popele you need to take out and get ut if it fails do it again. But as lon g as we are there poeple may be too scared to attempt a civil war thinking America would back up the governmental side.
__________________
Main Rig: I7 920 CPU, 6 Gigs ram 5870 GPU
M17X Laptop 2.8 Ghz Dual Core, 4870 Radeon
Nik00117 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0