|
|
#21 |
|
Baseband Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 66
|
Thats not my pointIAntDemo - I do agree that having big images does make it look tacky, but that's not what I meant. I meant that most people have information in their signature like web info or services/products. And with this idea that I had, it would not look tacky because it would not be big images they would all be small maybe 2 or 3 lines max
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Site Team
Join Date: May 2010
Location: United States
Posts: 2,335
|
I think this thread has run its course.
Some users like the idea of an image in the signature, but the majority of our members and staff do not feel that it would be the best move for the site overall. We'll consider this topic closed and maybe it will be brought up in the years to come. For now, however, the signature allowances shall remain as they are. Thanks for your dialogue everyone.
__________________
No rain - no raindbows |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|