Benchmark Results

j03 · 04-18-2010, 04:16 PM

Post them here. Use any app of your liking, and post a screenshot - Remember to say which version of the program you where using. Unless you say otherwise, we will assume that you have use the default settings.

I'll start.

Grantofhell · 04-18-2010, 04:23 PM

Rules? Required bench? (Program version, revision, style, settings)

Oooh. I'm gonna 1up you here.

REQUIRED: SuperPI 1.5XS 1M calculation - Screenshot
REQUIRED: Furmark Version 1.8 (Single/Double GPU) run in Benchmarking (PostFX checked) mode at 60000ms. Use 1440x900 if you're 16:9/16:10. And 1280x1024 for 4:3., no MSAA. - Screenshot

Unfortunately, because not everyone runs Vista/Seven, and not everyone wants to download a 500MB install, 3DMv can not be required, Nor can Unigine's Heaven 2.0, either.

But if you do decide to use them, leave the settings at completely stock (what the settings were at the time of opening).

j03 · 04-18-2010, 04:27 PM

There we go.

Grantofhell · 04-18-2010, 04:44 PM

REQUIRED results:

j03 · 04-18-2010, 04:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Grantofhell

Rules? Required bench? (Program version, revision, style, settings)

Oooh. I'm gonna 1up you here.

REQUIRED: SuperPI 1.5XS 1M calculation - Screenshot
REQUIRED: Furmark Version 1.8 (Single/Double GPU) run in Benchmarking (PostFX checked) mode at 60000ms Use 1280x1024, no MSAA. - Screenshot

Unfortunately, because not everyone runs Vista/Seven, and not everyone wants to download a 500MB install, 3DMv can not be required, Nor can Unigine's Heaven 2.0, either.

But if you do decide to use them, leave the settings at completely stock (what the settings were at the time of opening).

I'm going to 1up you there:

YOUR FURMARK BENCH ISN'T AT THE REQUIRED RESOLUTION

You've just lost the game

Also: Are you running 32bit W7?

Grantofhell · 04-18-2010, 04:58 PM

I know, I can't run 1280x1024. It's 4:3, I'm o 16:9.

Yes I am. Upgraded last night.

Unigine Heaven 2.0:

I'm going to get a different score basis from everyone else because of Tessellation. It does read GTS250 for GPU model, but based on the fact that it did use tessellation, I know the GTX470 was the render-er.

j03 · 04-18-2010, 06:15 PM

Awwwwwwwwwwww. I've got some serious overclocking to do

Any particular reason you chose x86?

Grantofhell · 04-18-2010, 07:10 PM

Compatibility. I'm definitely not going to own the rig long enough for using a 32bit OS to become a serious problem, and some of the apps I need to run only run on 32. Also, the performance increase from x86 to x64 would be minimal.

That looks like 3D06. I'll post a link to mine as well, then.

sniperviper21 · 04-18-2010, 08:19 PM

everything at stock.

Teny · 04-18-2010, 08:25 PM

So there are only 4 benches for now? (SuperPi, Heaven, 3D06, and furmark 1.8)
What should be the default resolution for the graphic benches? They kinda seem out of place for the Heaven benchmark.

04-18-2010, 04:16 PM	#1
j03 Cheesoid Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Wales Posts: 5,526	Benchmark Results Post them here. Use any app of your liking, and post a screenshot - Remember to say which version of the program you where using. Unless you say otherwise, we will assume that you have use the default settings. I'll start.

04-18-2010, 04:23 PM	#2
Grantofhell Fully Optimized Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 3,735	Re: Benchmark Results Rules? Required bench? (Program version, revision, style, settings) Oooh. I'm gonna 1up you here. REQUIRED: SuperPI 1.5XS 1M calculation - Screenshot REQUIRED: Furmark Version 1.8 (Single/Double GPU) run in Benchmarking (PostFX checked) mode at 60000ms. Use 1440x900 if you're 16:9/16:10. And 1280x1024 for 4:3., no MSAA. - Screenshot Unfortunately, because not everyone runs Vista/Seven, and not everyone wants to download a 500MB install, 3DMv can not be required, Nor can Unigine's Heaven 2.0, either. But if you do decide to use them, leave the settings at completely stock (what the settings were at the time of opening). __________________ Intel i7 950 @ 3.06 (133x23) // Evga 132-E758-A1 x58 SLI // Evga GeForce GTX 470 SC 1280MB // 6GB OCZ Reaper HPC PC3-16000 (3x2) // OCZ Vertex Turbo 30GB/64MB // SeaGate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB/16MB // Corsair 850HX-P // SilverStone TJ07 Koolance CPU-340 // Koolance VID-NX470 // EnzoTech Evx-58 // DangerDen BlackICE 240GTS // DangerDen BlackICE 240GTX // OCZ HydroPulse 500 // BitsPower Z-tank Inline 80mm // Asus VW266h // Logitech G9 // Saitek Cyborg

04-18-2010, 04:27 PM	#3
j03 Cheesoid Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Wales Posts: 5,526	Re: Benchmark Results There we go.

04-18-2010, 04:44 PM	#4
Grantofhell Fully Optimized Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 3,735	Re: Benchmark Results REQUIRED results: __________________ Intel i7 950 @ 3.06 (133x23) // Evga 132-E758-A1 x58 SLI // Evga GeForce GTX 470 SC 1280MB // 6GB OCZ Reaper HPC PC3-16000 (3x2) // OCZ Vertex Turbo 30GB/64MB // SeaGate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB/16MB // Corsair 850HX-P // SilverStone TJ07 Koolance CPU-340 // Koolance VID-NX470 // EnzoTech Evx-58 // DangerDen BlackICE 240GTS // DangerDen BlackICE 240GTX // OCZ HydroPulse 500 // BitsPower Z-tank Inline 80mm // Asus VW266h // Logitech G9 // Saitek Cyborg

04-18-2010, 04:58 PM	#6
Grantofhell Fully Optimized Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 3,735	Re: Benchmark Results I know, I can't run 1280x1024. It's 4:3, I'm o 16:9. Yes I am. Upgraded last night. Unigine Heaven 2.0: I'm going to get a different score basis from everyone else because of Tessellation. It does read GTS250 for GPU model, but based on the fact that it did use tessellation, I know the GTX470 was the render-er. __________________ Intel i7 950 @ 3.06 (133x23) // Evga 132-E758-A1 x58 SLI // Evga GeForce GTX 470 SC 1280MB // 6GB OCZ Reaper HPC PC3-16000 (3x2) // OCZ Vertex Turbo 30GB/64MB // SeaGate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB/16MB // Corsair 850HX-P // SilverStone TJ07 Koolance CPU-340 // Koolance VID-NX470 // EnzoTech Evx-58 // DangerDen BlackICE 240GTS // DangerDen BlackICE 240GTX // OCZ HydroPulse 500 // BitsPower Z-tank Inline 80mm // Asus VW266h // Logitech G9 // Saitek Cyborg

04-18-2010, 06:15 PM	#7
j03 Cheesoid Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Wales Posts: 5,526	Re: Benchmark Results Awwwwwwwwwwww. I've got some serious overclocking to do Any particular reason you chose x86?

04-18-2010, 07:10 PM	#8
Grantofhell Fully Optimized Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 3,735	Re: Benchmark Results Compatibility. I'm definitely not going to own the rig long enough for using a 32bit OS to become a serious problem, and some of the apps I need to run only run on 32. Also, the performance increase from x86 to x64 would be minimal. That looks like 3D06. I'll post a link to mine as well, then. __________________ Intel i7 950 @ 3.06 (133x23) // Evga 132-E758-A1 x58 SLI // Evga GeForce GTX 470 SC 1280MB // 6GB OCZ Reaper HPC PC3-16000 (3x2) // OCZ Vertex Turbo 30GB/64MB // SeaGate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB/16MB // Corsair 850HX-P // SilverStone TJ07 Koolance CPU-340 // Koolance VID-NX470 // EnzoTech Evx-58 // DangerDen BlackICE 240GTS // DangerDen BlackICE 240GTX // OCZ HydroPulse 500 // BitsPower Z-tank Inline 80mm // Asus VW266h // Logitech G9 // Saitek Cyborg

04-18-2010, 08:19 PM	#9
sniperviper21 Golden Master Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 5,358	Re: Benchmark Results everything at stock. __________________ You got to have a Fiddle in the band!

04-18-2010, 08:25 PM	#10
Teny (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻ Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: United States Posts: 5,956	Re: Benchmark Results So there are only 4 benches for now? (SuperPi, Heaven, 3D06, and furmark 1.8) What should be the default resolution for the graphic benches? They kinda seem out of place for the Heaven benchmark. __________________ Desktop -Cooler Master NV690/AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE/MSI 880G-E45 Motherboard/2 x 2GB DDR3 G.Skill Ripjaws X/Sapphire HD 5870 1GB GDDR5/CORSAIR CMPSU-550VX/Seagate 7200.12 500GB (OS), Samsung F3 1TB (Storage)/Sony DVD Burner/Windows 7 Professional 64-bit

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode