Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Networking | DNS
Join Computer forums Today

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-03-2015, 03:58 PM   #1
Beta Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: england
Posts: 2
Default implementing a file transporter


Hope someone can help. Not sure if anyone here has heard of file transporters?

Below is a series of google images of file transporters


We have 2 sites and want to do away with our windows server due to support costs, the option was to have a file transporter at each site, but I am wondering whats the best way to impliment file transporter safely? considering loss of data or security issues.

Our data usage is very light where we only use 80 gig at one site.

purge11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 04:05 AM   #2
Fully Optimized
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: England, Birmingham
Posts: 1,552
Default Re: implementing a file transporter

What I think you want is "Network Attached Storage" (NAS). It's basically an external harddrive with it's own network connectivity, it's a mini file-server really.

I'd have thought it would be about as safe as a Windows Server, some come with their own security etc.

Athlon II x4 645 || 1TB 7200rpm HDD || EVGA GTX 650Ti OC || 8GB DDR3 RAM || Windows 7 Home x64

i5 4210M || 500GB Samsung EVO 850 SSD || GeForce 825M || 16GB DDR3 RAM || Windows 10 x64
joedaman633 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-04-2015, 04:13 AM   #3
Beta Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: england
Posts: 2
Default Re: implementing a file transporter

Thanks for the response.

I guess your right since the file transporter basically is a NAS.

File Transporter for Individuals

Just wondering whats the best way to implement it rather than just plug it in and copy files across.
purge11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2015, 09:01 AM   #4
Site Team
root's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,872
Default Re: implementing a file transporter

what data/security issues do you have?

the iphone/android apps make me thing that files *may* be exposed to an API for easy connecting, (but that easy connecting might end up being a data leak one day!) -not that I'm saying that the OS is insecure, but handing off access to a 3rd party that you cannot vet is a risk that should be considered.

Do you currently use anything to replicate data between your sites, (e.g. DFS?) if you just have two files servers (one at each site) that are not replicating anyway, then these replicator things might be overkill for what you need.

If your primary focus is reducing costs then just don't upgrade windows? - the only cost is when you buy new!

if you want to stay current with your OS versions, (because you have a compliance issue that mandates that you must -so just leaving the existing servers you already paid for in place isn't an option) then you need to be looking at something like Linux and Samba for windows file and print sharing services without the need for a server license...

if you do have these compliance issues then you may find that almost no existing commercial NAS is strictly "suitable" as they generally all run some version of Linux, and generally never receive kernel updates of security patches.
I didn’t fight my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian…
Im sick of people saying 'dont waste paper'. If trees wanted to live, they'd all carry guns.
"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; The inherent vice of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."
root is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0