Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 07-23-2008, 03:09 PM   #21
xxcobraxx
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: England
Posts: 6,224
Default Re: Are Vistas worth buying over XP?

you say you have to fix it you tell me
__________________

__________________
Liveleaker
IAntDemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 03:26 PM   #22
Baseband Member
 
Siriann's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 45
Default Re: Are Vistas worth buying over XP?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antdemo View Post
you say you have to fix it you tell me
It's (generally) networking issues (drivers inexplicably messing up, etc).
__________________

__________________
_
Siriann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 03:28 PM   #23
xxcobraxx
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: England
Posts: 6,224
Default Re: Are Vistas worth buying over XP?

and why is that?? because your messing around with drivers to use to hack wep keys?

so you turn to linux.
__________________
Liveleaker
IAntDemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 03:41 PM   #24
BSOD
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 208
Default Re: Are Vistas worth buying over XP?

Joebro,

In my experience, for most single-core systems, i've found that Vista is not worth buying for XP, simply because it was not really optimized for single-core systems, which also usually include older RAM memory types with limited speed (such as PC133 or DDR, instead of DDR2 or DDR3). You would think it would naturally settle itself in a short time, but unfortunately, the large majority of computer users (even power users) are still running on single-core systems, and many of which with less than 2GB of RAM Memory (which has been proven necessary to run Vista reasonably).

Also, Vista's release was nearly two years ago, but not as many people have chosen it as their operating system as expected (the handover from XP to Vista has not been nearly as successful as the transition from 98/2000 to XP). Why is this? Because in the last 7 years, overall user experience has not changed significantly at all. To top that, getting computers to do most (if not all) tasks these days, is as low as it's ever been in the past 25 years. The functionalities that people used to pay thousands for in the 80s and 90s, can all be done with even the lowest-end computers available for purchase.

With this brought a new uniformity and standard to user interfaces and OS component organization, and because of that, there has not been much change in the Operating System world. A $4,000 system's operating system is not going to look or be any different than a modern $200 system, and the functionalities that most home and business users require on a daily basis will stay exactly the same.

With Windows XP becoming the standard over the past 7 years, for home users, power users, gamers, and commercial users, technological advancement was slow up until mid-to-late 2006, when dual-core processors and larger quantities of a newly-introduced, faster "DDR2" standard started to became the norm for manufacturers and retail stores. Unfortunately, most people didn't find (and still haven't found) much incentive for dual-core processing, which IS significantly more powerful and efficient than the standard single-core processing which reigned up until 2006, simply because there were not enough reasons to move forward other than compatibility issues.

It was hard for a standard user to find any value in the new functionalities which existed on Vista, and on top of that, Vista being made for dual-core systems, had problems with the older hardware (Which most people had), so early demand was extremely low, and the hardware manufacturers followed suit and did not put their drivers as top priority, so further incompatibility followed.

Now, most if not ALL systems sold in stores are now dual-core processing, and prices for dual-core systems have dropped dramatically as integrated circuit manufacturers have now put their focus on value, (and so we have developments like the "Pentium Dual Core" which is available for mighty cheap), so acceptance of Vista is increasing, but it was quite a slow start. Hopefully things will look better as functional drivers and functional hardware slowly bury the remains of Vista's utter failure of a start, and hopefully along with that, will do away with old inefficient technology.

(just my take)

So if XP works as fast as it possibly can already, with Pentium 4's and original Athlon 64s and Semprons, and they do everything that people need them to do, why switch over?
umakemebetter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 03:49 PM   #25
In Runtime
 
toole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 263
Default Re: Are Vistas worth buying over XP?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Antdemo View Post
and why is that?? because your messing around with drivers to use to hack wep keys?

so you turn to linux.
lol epeen
__________________
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 ** Intel ASUS P5Q-E 775 ** G.SKILL 4GB DDR2 1066 ** SAMSUNG Spinpoint F1 750GB ** Sapphire HD 4870-Cross-Fire-Diamond HD 4870 ** GIGABYTE 3D Aurora 570 ** 24" BenQ 5ms(1920x1200) LCD ** Vista64
toole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 03:55 PM   #26
Site Team
 
celegorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 10,713
Send a message via AIM to celegorm
Default Re: Are Vistas worth buying over XP?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Atomic Rooster View Post
QFT. I never had a problem finding the search function on XP. Click the Start button and it's right there.
yes but the search in XP didn't function as the run command like it does in Vista. I love that
__________________
"as a fanboy i refuse to admit it and will pull countless things out of my butt to disprove it"

Team Thelegorm! Total Kills: 21 (i iz in uor profile, editsing your sigz)
celegorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 04:05 PM   #27
Omnipotent One
 
Atomic Rooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 11,161
Send a message via AIM to Atomic Rooster Send a message via Yahoo to Atomic Rooster
Default Re: Are Vistas worth buying over XP?

Yea, I heard some people really like the new search in Vista.

I rarely, if ever, use the search function so it's not a big selling point for me.
Atomic Rooster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 04:12 PM   #28
In Runtime
 
toole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 263
Default Re: Are Vistas worth buying over XP?

Lol I love how I turned a largely opinionated battle (vista versus XP) into a "which has a sleeker search function" battle




**Destroying threads since 2004**

I agree with umakemebetter overall, though for high end builds, x64 has proven to have SOME improvements in gaming benchmarks.
__________________
Intel Core 2 Duo E8400 ** Intel ASUS P5Q-E 775 ** G.SKILL 4GB DDR2 1066 ** SAMSUNG Spinpoint F1 750GB ** Sapphire HD 4870-Cross-Fire-Diamond HD 4870 ** GIGABYTE 3D Aurora 570 ** 24" BenQ 5ms(1920x1200) LCD ** Vista64
toole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 04:23 PM   #29
Omnipotent One
 
Atomic Rooster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 11,161
Send a message via AIM to Atomic Rooster Send a message via Yahoo to Atomic Rooster
Default Re: Are Vistas worth buying over XP?

Good job toole.


If Microsoft ever has a promo like they did with XP Pro and sell Vista for $50, then maybe I'll get it.
Atomic Rooster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2008, 04:56 PM   #30
Golden Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,091
Default Re: Are Vistas worth buying over XP?

I find Vista usable, but it looks very messy in the Start menu. When I tweak it, it's much cleaner...but I do the same in XP and Linux.

If you want Vista, grab Business. If you want to stick to XP, stick with it. I prefer it is a better idea to wait, so you won't get caught with 7's release.
__________________

lhuser is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0