Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 12-16-2005, 01:35 AM   #81
Golden Master
 
ArrizX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,073
Send a message via MSN to ArrizX
Default Re: Top 10 reasons Intel will not participate in the Dual Core Duel

Yeah, id like to see some "futer project benchmarks" if there are any..
__________________

__________________
. ()()()()
./l ,[_\_\ ],
l---L ()lllllll()-
()_) ()_)--o-)_)
ArrizX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2005, 07:26 AM   #82
Daemon Poster
 
acphenom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 667
Send a message via MSN to acphenom Send a message via Yahoo to acphenom
Default Re: Top 10 reasons Intel will not participate in the Dual Core Duel

lol, no, not maurice or mixx, it was some dude of another forum.

And yeah, poor me. Well, actually, not really, I'm sorta 50/50 AMD and VIA, and 0 Intel, cause Prescotts SUCK major dick. Actually, maybe 49/49 AMD and VIA, and then 2 Intel, cause of the Pentium M's.
__________________

__________________
Windows XP Pro 17" LCD Monitor (1280 x 1024)
nForce3 250 Chipset Athlon 64 2800+ w/ C'n'Q
1 x 512MB DDR400 CL3 SDRAM 40GB IDE 7,200rpm HDD (8MB Cache)
nVidia GeForce MX420 64MB PCI On-Board Audio
acphenom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2005, 02:32 PM   #83
Golden Master
 
alvino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 19,967
Send a message via AIM to alvino
Default Re: Top 10 reasons Intel will not participate in the Dual Core Duel

I'm 45% AMD, 45% Intel and 10% for VIA & Transmeta.
alvino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2005, 06:29 PM   #84
Daemon Poster
 
acphenom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 667
Send a message via MSN to acphenom Send a message via Yahoo to acphenom
Default Re: Top 10 reasons Intel will not participate in the Dual Core Duel

Dammit, poor VIA and Transmeta...I mean, what did they ever do wrong? Besides Transmeta pricing their CPU's too expensive and magically disappearing, and VIA getting me too excited about their C7's when there isn't any I can find yet?
__________________
Windows XP Pro 17" LCD Monitor (1280 x 1024)
nForce3 250 Chipset Athlon 64 2800+ w/ C'n'Q
1 x 512MB DDR400 CL3 SDRAM 40GB IDE 7,200rpm HDD (8MB Cache)
nVidia GeForce MX420 64MB PCI On-Board Audio
acphenom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2005, 08:45 PM   #85
Golden Master
 
ArrizX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,073
Send a message via MSN to ArrizX
Default Re: Top 10 reasons Intel will not participate in the Dual Core Duel

i happen to like my prescott.. It keeps me warm..
__________________
. ()()()()
./l ,[_\_\ ],
l---L ()lllllll()-
()_) ()_)--o-)_)
ArrizX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2005, 08:56 PM   #86
Fully Optimized
 
MooseMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 2,627
Send a message via AIM to MooseMan
Default Re: Top 10 reasons Intel will not participate in the Dual Core Duel

Quote:
Originally Posted by arrizx
i happen to like my prescott.. It keeps me warm..
yea my board is a dumbass and doesn't kno how 2 read my prescotts temps...it's all like 127 *half a second later* 139!! *anouther split second* 115! rofl....i donno what it really runs at..
__________________
.::The top folder on the CF F@H team::.
http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/...&teamnum=42655
MooseMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2005, 09:13 PM   #87
Daemon Poster
 
acphenom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 667
Send a message via MSN to acphenom Send a message via Yahoo to acphenom
Default Re: Top 10 reasons Intel will not participate in the Dual Core Duel

The way I see it, just insulate your house, then fix yourself up with a VIA C7 (if you can find one obviously) or a Sempron or Athlon 64 with Cool'n'Quiet activated, to keep your energy bills down and help save energy.
__________________
Windows XP Pro 17" LCD Monitor (1280 x 1024)
nForce3 250 Chipset Athlon 64 2800+ w/ C'n'Q
1 x 512MB DDR400 CL3 SDRAM 40GB IDE 7,200rpm HDD (8MB Cache)
nVidia GeForce MX420 64MB PCI On-Board Audio
acphenom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2005, 09:20 PM   #88
Golden Master
 
athlon64fx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,153
Send a message via MSN to athlon64fx
Default Re: Top 10 reasons Intel will not participate in the Dual Core Duel

Quote:
Originally Posted by acphenom
Dammit, poor VIA and Transmeta...I mean, what did they ever do wrong? Besides Transmeta pricing their CPU's too expensive and magically disappearing, and VIA getting me too excited about their C7's when there isn't any I can find yet?
they dropped the bomb ever since linus torvalds got his grubby hands in thier company. he's an asshole since he acts like all linux users are nothing and hes everything. He takes credit for millions of people's work in linux. That makes him an asshole. He also acts liek an ass in interviews and stuff. Also e wants to "take transmeta in a new direction" ... down the pot!
athlon64fx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2005, 09:25 PM   #89
Daemon Poster
 
acphenom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 667
Send a message via MSN to acphenom Send a message via Yahoo to acphenom
Default Re: Top 10 reasons Intel will not participate in the Dual Core Duel

Damn, never heard Linus Torvalds being talked about in a negative way...you learn something everyday, I guess.

And yeah, I remember him being at Transmeta now...blimey, they suck, the money-sucking...(censor)
__________________
Windows XP Pro 17" LCD Monitor (1280 x 1024)
nForce3 250 Chipset Athlon 64 2800+ w/ C'n'Q
1 x 512MB DDR400 CL3 SDRAM 40GB IDE 7,200rpm HDD (8MB Cache)
nVidia GeForce MX420 64MB PCI On-Board Audio
acphenom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2005, 09:28 PM   #90
Golden Master
 
athlon64fx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 6,153
Send a message via MSN to athlon64fx
Default Re: Top 10 reasons Intel will not participate in the Dual Core Duel

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Feesh
Yes it is immature of AMD to poke fun at a competitor as they did. But if anyone done their research Intel has more sales then AMD. It is bullshit to say that Intel uses unfair tactics and are monopolizing on the CPU market. in order to be a monopoly they would have to be totally forcing AMD out of business; if AMD wants to make the product the leading CPU on the market they will need to make a better product, market it better and make it more appealing to the average consumer. Now if I am correct, and I know I am, then AMD is using the unfair tactic here. Intel has never made fun or any competitor, and if I am Wrong then show me the link. And a competitive product ad is not unfair.

cough...cough... Microsoft.. why isnt linux or apple users complaining how unfiar MS is? they do! same difference! intel was basically using the same tactic!

OH and BTW about LT, I saw exclusive interviews that I was a select member to see them. and they were so bad I chucked cookies. He made my stomach hurt. damb it was harsh what he had to say about Microsoft. He called any company that does the same thigns MS does a corporate snob, a real hogwash, and all kinds of kindergarten words, but in teh most evil voice it made me naseous! let's say I needed some tums after that one.
__________________

athlon64fx is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0