I was reading the ATI CrossFire Xpress 3200 article, and I noticed, nearly every single time they made mention of ATI, they had to throw somethign about NVIDIA in there! now, I do realise that when comparing the two video card companies together, it's inevitable to make a statement of the other company, however
Tom's Hardware made mention of NVIDIA more times in every paragraph then they did ATI, and nearly every single time the NVIDIA, or ATI, mention, wasn't even relavent to the topic!
Now I know that not every reviewing site out there is totally unbiased, but today from what I read in the article, which I will post the link to later on, was incredibly biased towards NVIDIA. The first 3 pages of the article were horrible, I couldn't distinguish if the article was about ATI or NVIDIA! If this is the kind of reviewing I see from Tom's Hardware, which is where I get most of my knowledge from, then I don't think I'll trust some of their benchmarks anymore.
From a company that is ranked extemly high in the PC enthusist area, I expect a lot more from them. This display of biaism is just ridiculous. Can't people get an honest review about something these days???