Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 08-03-2007, 08:03 PM   #11
In Runtime
 
dbzkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 129
Default Re: short question!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kage View Post
Its just a shame you'd need a nuclear power plant in your PC huh?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
well probably by the time some one actually developes somthing like that there will be other ways of cooling and probably diffrent types of processors that will run more efficient but hey who know what will happen
__________________

dbzkid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 08:45 PM   #12
Fully Optimized
 
esa193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,210
Send a message via AIM to esa193
Default Re: short question!!!

that does and dosnt make sense in a way
a dual core/quad core may not have as many pipelines as a gpu
but they can run 1-4 (depending on the prossesor) peaces of info
at a much much much faster rate then a gpu
putting just as much info as a gpu
but a gpu and a cpu r designed for different thinks
a gpu needs more pipelines then a cpu
because it needs to put up a lot of pixels on the screen to show an image
but a cpu focuses on more of a direct task
(like for instance giving the gpu information on a tertian task and how to use that information)
__________________

__________________
antec 900, q6600, 4G, 500G, 160G, 9800gtx, 780i, 47in 1080ptv, 5.1 surround sound

MacArthur wrestling pwns!
esa193 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 08:50 PM   #13
Fully Optimized
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,629
Send a message via AIM to ߧ∩H♠H䎀
Default Re: short question!!!

Wasn't AMD talking about intergrating both the cpu/gpu together at one time? I see that happening down the road of course we will all need new hardware but thats probally the future after they make something like phase cooling more affordable.
ߧ∩H♠H䎀 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 08:52 PM   #14
Golden Master
 
Kage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 13,873
Send a message via MSN to Kage
Default Re: short question!!!

Well, they own ATI now. No reason why they couldn't develop a chip that did this.

esa193, I get your point, but my point still stands that the GPU is more complex than a CPU, and is theroretically more powerful.
__________________
Abit IP35 Pro / Q6600 G0 / Zalman 9700 / 8800GTS 640mb / 4x 2GB Corsair XMS / X-FI Xtreme M / 1x 1TB / Antec 900 / Logitech Z-5500 / Samsung 20inch
Kage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2007, 09:05 PM   #15
Fully Optimized
 
esa193's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,210
Send a message via AIM to esa193
Default Re: short question!!!

i can deff see that down the line the gpu right in the cpu
that would deff make things more power full
and a lot less compatibility problems with games
make systems a lot more a like
__________________
antec 900, q6600, 4G, 500G, 160G, 9800gtx, 780i, 47in 1080ptv, 5.1 surround sound

MacArthur wrestling pwns!
esa193 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2007, 01:09 AM   #16
In Runtime
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 446
Send a message via MSN to Comp_Pro
Default Re: short question!!!

Graphics Card.
__________________

__________________
Intel i7 4770k 3.50ghz, 32gb Corsair Vengeance RAM (8x4 kit), 2 x 2TB WD Black HHD, nVidia 770GTX 4gb OC, Asus Z87-A Motherboard, running Windows 7 64 bit.
Comp_Pro is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0