short question!!!

[dbzkid]

Its just a shame you'd need a nuclear power plant in your PC huh?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
well probably by the time some one actually developes somthing like that there will be other ways of cooling and probably diffrent types of processors that will run more efficient but hey who know what will happen

 

[esa193]

that does and dosnt make sense in a way
a dual core/quad core may not have as many pipelines as a gpu
but they can run 1-4 (depending on the prossesor) peaces of info
at a much much much faster rate then a gpu
putting just as much info as a gpu
but a gpu and a cpu r designed for different thinks
a gpu needs more pipelines then a cpu
because it needs to put up a lot of pixels on the screen to show an image
but a cpu focuses on more of a direct task
(like for instance giving the gpu information on a tertian task and how to use that information)

 

[Äߧý∩†H♠H䎀]

Wasn't AMD talking about intergrating both the cpu/gpu together at one time? I see that happening down the road of course we will all need new hardware but thats probally the future after they make something like phase cooling more affordable.

 

[Kage]

Well, they own ATI now. No reason why they couldn't develop a chip that did this.

esa193, I get your point, but my point still stands that the GPU is more complex than a CPU, and is theroretically more powerful.

 

[esa193]

i can deff see that down the line the gpu right in the cpu
that would deff make things more power full
and a lot less compatibility problems with games
make systems a lot more a like

 

[Comp_Pro]

Graphics Card.