Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Join Computer forums Today

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 09-06-2006, 03:24 PM   #1
Solid State Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 8
Talking Recommend me a mid-budget graphics card.

Hey guys.

I need a new graphics card - mine sucks hehe. It's a Radeon X550.

These are my PC specs from Belarc:


3.60 gigahertz Intel Pentium 4
16 kilobyte primary memory cache
2048 kilobyte secondary memory cache

Main Circuit Board:

Bus Clock: 200 megahertz
BIOS: American Megatrends Inc. 0304 01/03/2006

Memory Modules:

1024 Megabytes Installed Memory
Slot 'DIMM0' has 512 MB (serial number SerNum0)
Slot 'DIMM1' has 512 MB


RADEON X550 [Display adapter]
RADEON X550 Secondary [Display adapter]
Samsung SyncMaster [Monitor] (19.1"vis, s/n H9NYC39205, December 2005)

Bus Adapters:

SiS 7001 PCI to USB Open Host Controller (3x)
SiS PCI to USB Enhanced Host Controller

I use my video card mainly for gaming and DVD watching. On both the picture comes out somewhat pixelated and bad quality, even with the settings in the software set to the highest. I'm assuming that means as it's a low-budget video card it's not powerful enough to run these things, and display it through my quite large 19" monitor.

On a budget of around 120 (about $200) and not much more, could you suggest me a good video card??

Many thanks in advance for all help/advice.

jimmy_fowler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 03:49 PM   #2
Fully Optimized
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,276
Default Re: Recommend me a mid-budget graphics card.

nvidia 7600gt. best bang for your buck.. but since you have 120 euro to spend uh..try the 7900gs?.. i dunno i haven't done much research on that card, i'm not sure about it's performance since it's relatively new.

| AMD 3800+ X2 Dual Core Processor | ASUS A8N-e nF4 Ultra | Hitachi Deskstar 250gb 3.0 gb/s | 1gb Corsair Value RAM 2x512 | eVGA geforce 6800GS | sound blaster live! 24-bit | NZXT Trinity Classic chassis | OCZ GameXStream OCZ700GXSSLI PSU |
I was there. In the networking forum for the first time, and it was because.. of 341
kchi55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 05:25 PM   #3
Golden Master
Cabbs's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,912
Send a message via AIM to Cabbs
Default Re: Recommend me a mid-budget graphics card.

I just saw it a few seconds ago on newegg, $200, im gonna look into it.
=Like anime? Come to AnimeAppeal.com!=
||DFI UT P35||Q9550@3400 Mhz||Geil 4GB RAM||Radeon 5770||
Cabbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2006, 06:12 PM   #4
Daemon Poster
THEpiGUY's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 598
Send a message via AIM to THEpiGUY
Default Re: Recommend me a mid-budget graphics card.

The 7600GT definitely won't let you down, many people on these forums are very pleased with them, but since I assume you won't be doing SLI (multi NVIDIA graphics cards), I'd get an ATI X850XT PE. It's a highly underrated card IMO that almost is forgotten about now because of the launch of NVIDIA's newer 7 series cards (7600GT, 7900GT, etc.)

The 7600GT possibly would be the winner in my book if it had a 256-bit memory interface, but the 128-bit is really weak for a 7 series card, even a 6 series one. It holds the bandwidth back so it's 1/2x the bandwidth of a 256-bit interface. Plus, the card has fewer pixel pipelines, and it's core speed can't make up for the loss. This results in fewer shader operations per second, which are necessary for pretty much every modern game.

Main Stats:

Core Clock: 560MHz
Memory Clock: 700MHz
Bandwidth: 22.4 GB/s
Shader Ops./second: 6720
Fragment Pipelines: 12

Core Clock: 540MHz
Memory Clock: 590MHz
Bandwidth: 37.76 GB/s
Shader Ops./second: 8640
Fragment Pipelines: 16

There is a good reason that the clocks are lower for the X850XT PE. The core clock being lower is alright because it has 16 fragment pipelines. This completely makes up for the lower clock, and more. The memory clock being lower is also alright because of its 256-bit memory interface. Basically, if the clocks were the same, the 256-bit would have twice the bandwidth of the 128-bit card. So really, 256-bit @ 590 > 128-bit @ 700.

Many may disagree with me on my decision, but I really think that this is an underrated card. I haven't heard of any history regarding this card failing or DOA. Feel free to go with a 7600GT, as I've heard they're great, but I just personally think this would be a better choice for $200.

EDIT:Also, (sorry for the really long post) what kchi55 said, the 7900GS would be the best choice if you've got the money. I read right over what he had said. The 7900GS would smoke both these cards, so if you're willing to spend a little more $ (looks to fit into your $200 range) then I'd definitely go for it. So I've pretty much changed my mind ... The 7900GS would be incredible.
( See, I can admit it's better. NVIDIA deserves to win this one.)

Just thought I'd throw this in:

7900GS Main Stats:
Core Clock: 450MHz
Memory Clock: 660MHz
Bandwidth: 42.24 GB/s
Shader Ops./second: 9000
Fragment Pipelines: 20
ASUS A8N32 SLI-Deluxe, AMD Athlon X2 3800+ @ 2.8GHz, eVGA 8800GTS 320MB, 2GB Corsair XMS DDR400, 160GB WD HDD + 320GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.10, AC Freezer 64 Pro, 700W OCZ GameXStream, NZXT Zero :D

I think I've decided to leave... maybe I'll come back sometime.
THEpiGUY is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0