Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 08-21-2011, 02:23 AM   #11
Solid State Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 14
Default Re: which processor is better

An overclocked i7-2600k supposedly gets performance levels comparable to 900-1000$ very high end CPUs (and it's a third of the price). It's probably the best processor out there that regular folks can afford. From reviews I've read, there seems to be some stability issues (there are occasional slow downs), but it's worth the processing power.

As for an overclocked i5-2500k, it's probably the best mid-range CPU you can find at the moment. Comparable to to the i7-950/960 of the first generation i processors. I've seen some pretty impressive video game benchmarks with this processor for the price.
__________________

Josh Rider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2011, 03:10 PM   #12
Fully Optimized
 
Indigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,866
Default Re: which processor is better

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheNerdal View Post
Depends on what you're doing. For gaming, the AMD beats Intel, for anything else, get the Intel. If you're on a budget, get the AMD. There's not really a better CPU. It all comes down to one's preference.
This is not accurate anymore. Intel is actually faster in gaming than AMD now, until you get the systems to a high resolution on a high end video card, and then they perform pretty much the same, since the bottleneck becomes the video card. Both processor families can keep a modern high end GPU stocked with enough data to play games at high resolutions. The only part that is true, is the money factor. Since both are good at high resolution gaming, it makes sense, fiscally, to go with AMD if you don't do a lot of compute heavy tasks (and even then there are indeed some that AMD is still pretty good at compared to Intel, but the delta is pretty small)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Rider
An overclocked i7-2600k supposedly gets performance levels comparable to 900-1000$ very high end CPUs (and it's a third of the price). It's probably the best processor out there that regular folks can afford. From reviews I've read, there seems to be some stability issues (there are occasional slow downs), but it's worth the processing power.
Very true. I've had hands on with the 2600k and it's just an absolute performance monster. I almost didn't deliver the system to the guy we were building it for to keep it for myself, until I realized I'd never be able to push it running things like office and vSphere. D'oh!
__________________

Indigo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 05:53 PM   #13
Daemon Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 669
Default Re: which processor is better

Dual Core I5 < Phenom X4 < Quad core I5
aPanzerIV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 08:08 PM   #14
BSOD
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 45
Default Re: which processor is better

Amd is better for games, take a amd athlon II at 3.21ghz I overclocked it to 4.12ghz, and still using onbord video
crashoveride is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2011, 04:09 AM   #15
Baseband Member
 
Kgury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 65
Default Re: which processor is better

AMD GPU Drivers blow

my i7 920 is OC'd to 4.25 GHz
__________________

__________________
"A successful man is one who can lay a firm foundation with the bricks others have thrown at him."
-David Brinkley
Kgury is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0