Originally Posted by Brookfield
I am not that technical, I hear what you are saying but the sigs I have adjusted so far have worked out on the whole, I think there was only one, I couldn't sqeeze into five lines, but surely leaving out one spec isn't going to ruin it, probably just my view, but do the specs have to be in sigs at all?, members could just bring them up in posts when & where necessary to assist the subject matter in hand.
As a whole, it's probably really not all that necessary. But people like the freedom to do so. I suggest you guys check out overclock.net's signature system for thier forums, it would be very nice to have something similar here.
Not to mention it would also put an end to this 5 sig max problem we are having. But even if a system like overclock.net's is out of the question, surely there is some way to put a cap on the amount of information available in signatures..
Not to mention the fact that no where in the register agreement to CF does it say you must have 5 lines or less in your signature... so yeah, I don't see how you guys think it's even remotely practical to get everyone to adhere to a rule like this when nobody knows about until they have been told by somebody... just my opinion, though.
putting the rule in a sticky might somewhat help this problem, but as I mentioned before, resolutions make a difference. So try not to get impatient with a user that wont change his sig when you tell him to, you never know what the situation may fully be..
For some reason I felt like being blank, so I erased my sig and took down my avatar...
However, I do like your sig, brookfield/Maurcie/whatever you want to be called.