Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 11-29-2005, 06:45 PM   #31
Fully Optimized
 
ownage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,404
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

Quote:
Originally Posted by arrizx
Oh man, let me guess.... Amd..
That was hard.. hehe..
No, Intels encode videos faster than AMD. There reason why is that Intel has longer pipelines, thus fast clock speeds. When it comes to video encoding, it does the same thing over and over again, not like gaming where it the program has branches. Video encoding doesnt branch because its the same process over and over again. When a program branches, the processor has to flush its pipelines clean, but since video encoding you dont have to flush it out since its the same thing over and over again. Have fun reading I dont encode videos so im an AMD person. If i were ever to encode videos, ill go Intel most definately.
__________________

ownage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 06:51 PM   #32
Golden Master
 
jac006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,810
Send a message via AIM to jac006
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

Well.... I don't know... dual opteron's pwns any cpu out today, and that was in video encoding. I don't know how the EE dual core would've done, but the opteron did an amazing job... beating even a 4.25ghz pent. 4....
__________________

__________________
Macbook Pro and Logitech z5500s. All you really need.
jac006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 06:56 PM   #33
Daemon Poster
 
Kuberr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 609
Send a message via AIM to Kuberr Send a message via MSN to Kuberr
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ownage
No, Intels encode videos faster than AMD. There reason why is that Intel has longer pipelines, thus fast clock speeds. When it comes to video encoding, it does the same thing over and over again, not like gaming where it the program has branches. Video encoding doesnt branch because its the same process over and over again. When a program branches, the processor has to flush its pipelines clean, but since video encoding you dont have to flush it out since its the same thing over and over again. Have fun reading I dont encode videos so im an AMD person. If i were ever to encode videos, ill go Intel most definately.
Yeah, I thought that Intel encoded video faster, but I was afraid to say that. :P

Don't Opterons have one more HyperTransport thing? They have three isntead of two like the FX or 64 series, don't they?
__________________
Athlon FX-55 San Diego 2.6GhZ OCed to 3.0GhZ | Mushkin Redline XP 2x1GB PC4000 DDR500 3-3-2-8 OCed to 250MhZ | Seagate Barracuda SATA 400GB 7200RPM HDD | evGA GeForce 6800GT 350/1000 OCed to 425/1150
Kuberr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 06:58 PM   #34
Fully Optimized
 
ownage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,404
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jac006
Well.... I don't know... dual opteron's pwns any cpu out today, and that was in video encoding. I don't know how the EE dual core would've done, but the opteron did an amazing job... beating even a 4.25ghz pent. 4....
Im talking single cores here.
ownage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 07:08 PM   #35
Golden Master
 
alvino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 19,967
Send a message via AIM to alvino
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

Yeah, cheater!
alvino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 07:12 PM   #36
Golden Master
 
ArrizX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,073
Send a message via MSN to ArrizX
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

and im going to do encoding why? lol?
__________________
. ()()()()
./l ,[_\_\ ],
l---L ()lllllll()-
()_) ()_)--o-)_)
ArrizX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 07:13 PM   #37
Golden Master
 
jac006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,810
Send a message via AIM to jac006
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

Quote:
Originally Posted by alvino
Yeah, cheater!
Hey, the fx-57 might just be able to do an equal job with the 3.8ghz EE intel... I want to see some benchmark's...
__________________
Macbook Pro and Logitech z5500s. All you really need.
jac006 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 07:19 PM   #38
Golden Master
 
ArrizX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,073
Send a message via MSN to ArrizX
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

Quote:
Originally Posted by jac006
Hey, the fx-57 might just be able to do an equal job with the 3.8ghz EE intel... I want to see some benchmark's...
and id like to know why id plan on video codeing, after of course i figure it out, lol..
__________________
. ()()()()
./l ,[_\_\ ],
l---L ()lllllll()-
()_) ()_)--o-)_)
ArrizX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 07:50 PM   #39
Golden Master
 
alvino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 19,967
Send a message via AIM to alvino
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

Because not everyone who uses a computer plans to game with it. Some use it for video editing, etc.
alvino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 09:07 PM   #40
Golden Master
 
ArrizX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,073
Send a message via MSN to ArrizX
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

Yeah, but not me, lol..
__________________

__________________
. ()()()()
./l ,[_\_\ ],
l---L ()lllllll()-
()_) ()_)--o-)_)
ArrizX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0