Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 11-28-2005, 11:15 PM   #11
Golden Master
 
ArrizX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,073
Send a message via MSN to ArrizX
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

Quote:
Originally Posted by TRDCorolla
One thing for sure. Your system will smoke my laptop, lol.
Didnt even see this post, but i feel so much better that my PC can smoke a LAPTOP like omfg woohoo!!! amazing... lol *kicks computer*
__________________

__________________
. ()()()()
./l ,[_\_\ ],
l---L ()lllllll()-
()_) ()_)--o-)_)
ArrizX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2005, 11:15 PM   #12
Golden Master
 
ISOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,208
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

I'm going to need to run some 3dmark or something to see what kind of numbers I'm dealing with. I'm going to get that thing installed later this week, hopefully. Newegg's got it shipped, barely just now...waiting game.

Pentium 4 is suppose to be a good processor, if Intel didn't slack off in the long run. That system will last you a few more years. That laptop is running on a 4200RPM drive or something like that. Sooooooo slow.
__________________

__________________
*Fact: Microsoft Window's Blue Screen of Death vs Computerforums.org's White Screen of Death. Which is worse?
ISOwner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2005, 11:22 PM   #13
Golden Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,091
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

My P 233 MMX lappy with USB intergrated i it OWNS you
lhuser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 12:30 AM   #14
In Runtime
 
DirtBikeRidr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 353
Send a message via AIM to DirtBikeRidr Send a message via MSN to DirtBikeRidr
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

i onno. my p4 3.2ghz owns my friends amd 3000.
__________________
Desktop -- P4 3.2 Ghz + Asus mobo + 1.5 GB ram DDR + 250GB HDD + ATI x700 (time to upgrade)
Laptop --White MacBook 13" Core 2 Duo 2GHz/ 2gb ram / 500gb / Dual boot
DirtBikeRidr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 12:39 AM   #15
Golden Master
 
ArrizX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,073
Send a message via MSN to ArrizX
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DirtBikeRidr
i onno. my p4 3.2ghz owns my friends amd 3000.
nice
__________________
. ()()()()
./l ,[_\_\ ],
l---L ()lllllll()-
()_) ()_)--o-)_)
ArrizX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 01:41 AM   #16
Fully Optimized
 
ownage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,404
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

how about arrizx, lets see whos processor can encode videos faster
ownage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 01:42 AM   #17
Golden Master
 
ArrizX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,073
Send a message via MSN to ArrizX
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ownage
how about arrizx, lets see whos processor can encode videos faster
Oh man, let me guess.... Amd..
That was hard.. hehe..
__________________
. ()()()()
./l ,[_\_\ ],
l---L ()lllllll()-
()_) ()_)--o-)_)
ArrizX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 02:02 AM   #18
Golden Master
 
alvino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 19,967
Send a message via AIM to alvino
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

The Pentium 4 isn't so bad. The Northwood and Gallatin cores were awesome, back when Intel didn't do anything stupid.
alvino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 02:06 AM   #19
Golden Master
 
ArrizX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,073
Send a message via MSN to ArrizX
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

*sigh*

What else is the problem with them, other then not being Amd...?
__________________
. ()()()()
./l ,[_\_\ ],
l---L ()lllllll()-
()_) ()_)--o-)_)
ArrizX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-29-2005, 02:20 AM   #20
Golden Master
 
alvino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 19,967
Send a message via AIM to alvino
Default Re: My intel vs ur Amd..?

Lets see...

The new Prescott core is decent at best. It's fast and can definately overclock like a biatch. However, there are a few shortcomings Intel has failed to fix.

1.) No integrated memory controller. This means that the memory controller is in the northbridge and latency is way high.

2.) Lots of pipelines and longer. Prescotts have 31 pipelines that are longer than the Northwood ones, and there's something bad about that. However, since I'm not exactly familiar with what that is, I shall direct any questions to Ownage for awnsering. Trust me though, more pipelines that are longer are not good for processors.
__________________

alvino is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0