Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 03-10-2006, 03:50 PM   #1
Golden Master
 
ArrizX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,073
Send a message via MSN to ArrizX
Default Memory timings?

Will someone just explain this to me. Because its like.. 2.5-3-3-7. (example). But what are they for, what do they tell you. At the moment, they mean nothing to me, lol..
__________________

__________________
. ()()()()
./l ,[_\_\ ],
l---L ()lllllll()-
()_) ()_)--o-)_)
ArrizX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2006, 05:15 PM   #2
Golden Master
 
MikeReiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,053
Send a message via AIM to MikeReiner Send a message via MSN to MikeReiner Send a message via Yahoo to MikeReiner
Default Re: Memory timings?

Timings.. latency... lower = FASTER, more PERFORMANCE..you get the idea.
__________________

MikeReiner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2006, 05:18 PM   #3
Fully Optimized
 
The Amish Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,034
Send a message via AIM to The Amish Kid
Default Re: Memory timings?

Well the main one you should be concerned with is the first one. That's your CAS latency. The lower the better.
__________________
The Amish computer:
AMD Opteron 165 CCBWE 0551@ 2.25ghz(250 x 9) 1.45v cooled w/ Thermaltake Big Typhoon | DFI LP Ultra D | eVGA 7800GT@ 465/1110 | Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeMusic | 2GB G. Skill DDR 500 @ 250mhz 3-4-4-8 | 80 GB SATA + 40GB SATA + 200GB IDE| 480w Thermaltake Silent purepower | Thermaltake Tsunami Dream case (Black) | Windows XP Pro |
The Amish Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2006, 05:23 PM   #4
Golden Master
 
MikeReiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,053
Send a message via AIM to MikeReiner Send a message via MSN to MikeReiner Send a message via Yahoo to MikeReiner
Default Re: Memory timings?

yeah, supposedly 2.0 is really high performance and constitutes spending an extra $50.

personally, I think 2.5 is perfectly fine.

Amish kid has 1,111 posts :P
MikeReiner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2006, 06:03 PM   #5
Golden Master
 
G35x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,474
Default Re: Memory timings?

Yeah i have 2.5 i dont really think 2 is all the great its not that big of a difference from 2.0-2.5
__________________
Check out my car forum..
altimacoupes.com

what is up vanilla face
G35x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2006, 08:40 PM   #6
BSOD
 
Flipper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 246
Default Re: Memory timings?

It is a major difference between DDR and DDR2.

Socket AM2 (AMD's Upcoming socket) will use DDR2 RAM on it's motherboards, since DDR2 runs at faster clock speeds, there is of course a down point. The cas latency, The cas latency on DDR2 RAM is MUCH higher than DDR, to define cas latency it is basically measured in nanoseconds the amount of delay between running applications, thats why the lower the CL the faster you perform.
Technical Definition:
CAS latency is determined by dividing the column access time by the memory clock cycle time. Simply put, the CAS latency is the number of clock cycles it takes the memory to respond to an operation request. Lower CAS latency, therefore, will normally give slightly better performance than higher CAS latency. The default CAS latency for SDRAM is 3 and for DDR is 2.5. The lowest possible CAS latency is 2.


Alright now for the example between DDR and DDR2 RAM's speed compared to CL:

See DDR2:


Notice on one of those timings it is 4-4-4-12! So I guess it's safe to assume the average DDR2 Cas latency is 4.

Now on to DDR:


Now you can see the average CL for DDR RAM is around 2.5-3 going as low as 2.

As I've shown there are some advantages to both....wow...I just rambled and spent way too much time on one post that wasn't even relevant to the topic, I feel like a high school teacher.
Flipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2006, 09:29 PM   #7
Golden Master
 
MikeReiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,053
Send a message via AIM to MikeReiner Send a message via MSN to MikeReiner Send a message via Yahoo to MikeReiner
Default Re: Memory timings?

Haha, it's good information for those who do not know much on the subject though. so don't feel too bad.
MikeReiner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2006, 12:08 AM   #8
Fully Optimized
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,887
Default Re: Memory timings?

Actually, the lowest CAS latency I've seen is 1.5...
Jamxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2006, 01:39 AM   #9
Golden Master
 
ArrizX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,073
Send a message via MSN to ArrizX
Default Re: Memory timings?

OK.. and what are the other numbers?
__________________
. ()()()()
./l ,[_\_\ ],
l---L ()lllllll()-
()_) ()_)--o-)_)
ArrizX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2006, 01:48 AM   #10
BSOD
 
Flipper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 246
Default Re: Memory timings?

Oh the other numbers in the timings? Those aren't nearly as important but.......

In your case:
2.5- CAS latency time
3- RAS# to CAS# delay
3- RAS# Precharge
7- Act to Precharge Delay

Source for what those mean : http://www.andrew.cmu.edu/user/fma/P4tweakRAM2.htm
__________________

Flipper is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0