A Little Advice...?

[Lord Kalthorn]

The 650 is still better for the same price 2 Megs Cache! HT!

 

[acphenom]

Technically, AMD CPU's can't be that much worse at multi-tasking than Intels, cause they can process more tasks per...whatever, can't they?

Go for an Athlon 64. Any Intel and i'll never forgive you.

3500+ looks good. Just make sure you get a Venice core. Why? Dunno, it's just the latest one and has SSE3 and all that stuff.

 

[TmDrak]

Talking about Intel makes my head hurt = (

 

[Lord Kalthorn]

You'd get DDR2 with a 650

 

[TmDrak]

Cmon man, it not funny no more, I just wanna get AMD

 

[The Amish Kid]

i found a 3700+ for just a little bit more then that 3500

EDIT: oops, I forgot the link
http://www.pricegrabber.com/p__AMD_Athlon_64_3700_Processor,__8098506

 

[The Amish Kid]

what is your budget for graphics card(s)?

 

[alvino]

You'd get DDR2 with a 650

So? AMD is going with DDR2 next year anyways. And no, DDR3 won't be out by then!

 

[acphenom]

lol, a K8 CPU with low-latency Dual-Channel DDR400 SDRAM configuration probably works just as good if not better than a P4 with DDR2-667 SDRAM.

Anyway, yeah, go for a Venice 3500+ and then look for a top graphics card.

 

[Lord Kalthorn]

So? AMD is going with DDR2 next year anyways. And no, DDR3 won't be out by then!

Nah... I realise that It won't be DDR3, they will have DoubleD-DR by then!

Nah, I suppose I get what you mean... if you want an AMD Can't think of why... but if you do, then I'd have to agree with them, a Venice would be the best bet, and a 3500+ would be a damned good all-rounder.