Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 09-24-2007, 06:21 PM   #21
BSOD
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 30
Default Re: Intel UPDATE--New architecture after Penryn

I work at Intel, and I can tell you that nothing like this has ever come up. It's just a road map people, don't get our hopes to high. I'll ask the engineers that work in the factory with me. They might know a thing or two.
__________________

Vylence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 06:47 PM   #22
Daemon Poster
 
NEED WOW NOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,315
Send a message via AIM to NEED WOW NOW
Default Re: Intel UPDATE--New architecture after Penryn

^^ Sweet U Work At Intel ^-^
__________________

__________________
AMD is Happy!
Intel is Pissed!
Europe is $1.45 Billion Dollar's Richer!
NEED WOW NOW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-24-2007, 06:53 PM   #23
BSOD
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 30
Default Re: Intel UPDATE--New architecture after Penryn

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEED WOW NOW View Post
^^ Sweet U Work At Intel ^-^
yes i work at the North West Packaging and Distribution center for Microprocessors. I work at the Hawthorn Farms campus, which is next to the infamous Jones Farm campus. here's a link...

Hawthorn Farm Campus
http://www.intel.com/pressroom/kits/...arm_photos.htm

Jones Farm Intel HQ
http://www.intel.com/pressroom/kits/...arm_photos.htm
Vylence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 02:12 AM   #24
Golden Master
 
ISOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,208
Default Re: Intel UPDATE--New architecture after Penryn

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vylence View Post
I work at Intel, and I can tell you that nothing like this has ever come up. It's just a road map people, don't get our hopes to high. I'll ask the engineers that work in the factory with me. They might know a thing or two.
Are you sure? The Roadmap was taken right off of Intel's main website, lol. It's pretty legit. Most of the plan on the road map have been implemented very precisely. Unless you have more insight on it. I love to hear more about it.
__________________
*Fact: Microsoft Window's Blue Screen of Death vs Computerforums.org's White Screen of Death. Which is worse?
ISOwner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 07:02 PM   #25
BSOD
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 7
Default Re: Intel UPDATE--New architecture after Penryn

Quote:
Originally Posted by ISOwner View Post
Are you sure? The Roadmap was taken right off of Intel's main website, lol. It's pretty legit. Most of the plan on the road map have been implemented very precisely. Unless you have more insight on it. I love to hear more about it.
Well Arrizx banned my account yesterday, but I've taken the issue up with David for his rash and immature behavior. But, back to the main topic...

While at work today eatting lunch in the Cafeteria I overheard some of the Engineers discussing some new way for the server products to by-pass certain types of hardware to make them faster, such as, what they suggested was by-passing (And I'll share with you the fact that I have NO idea how they'd do this) certain parts or sections within a hard drive, maybe certain data, not to sure. But after thinking about it for a few minutes and the new SMT technology Intel is releasing it kind of made sense in its own little way.

Now, that's NOT to say that's an Intel official idea, maybe just two engineers shooting ideas off one another. But regardless it was cool to think about. How if you update one component of a PC/Server that the new technology in it wouldn't allow a bottle neck from an older component, perhaps by-passing protocols or something. Either way it was cool to listen too. The tech guys always talk about really interesting ideas and what not.
OneUpsetMember is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-25-2007, 10:08 PM   #26
Golden Master
 
ISOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,208
Default Re: Intel UPDATE--New architecture after Penryn

He banned you?!?! I had no idea that happened. What was the reason behind it?
__________________
*Fact: Microsoft Window's Blue Screen of Death vs Computerforums.org's White Screen of Death. Which is worse?
ISOwner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2007, 05:56 AM   #27
Golden Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,091
Default Re: Intel UPDATE--New architecture after Penryn

If it's you Vylence, then I want you in the forum.
lhuser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2007, 02:05 PM   #28
Fully Optimized
 
MooseMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 2,627
Send a message via AIM to MooseMan
Default Re: Intel UPDATE--New architecture after Penryn

Quote:
Originally Posted by lhuser View Post
If it's you Vylence, then I want you in the forum.
do u mean you want him unbanned?
__________________
.::The top folder on the CF F@H team::.
http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/...&teamnum=42655
MooseMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2007, 05:24 PM   #29
Golden Master
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 13,091
Default Re: Intel UPDATE--New architecture after Penryn

Yeah.
lhuser is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2007, 09:06 PM   #30
Golden Master
 
ISOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,208
Default Re: Intel UPDATE--New architecture after Penryn

AMD Phenom Launch Schedule & Roadmap
http://sg.vr-zone.com/?i=5078#Scene_1
__________________

__________________
*Fact: Microsoft Window's Blue Screen of Death vs Computerforums.org's White Screen of Death. Which is worse?
ISOwner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0