Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 02-11-2005, 10:07 PM   #1
In Runtime
 
plague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 118
Default Intel is not going to build a 64-bit processor

If intel were to build a 64-bit processor for a PC then they would have pay AMD to use their copyright,(AMD has copyrighted the 64-bit processor) and Intell would never pay AMD. So the only thing Intel can do is build a duel 32-bit processor to fit into one CPU, and I do not think they are going to do that. They might as well come up with a 128-bit processor.(that would be cool) But on the other hand they might if longhorn only supports 64-bit processors. It is a complicated issue.
__________________

plague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2005, 10:14 PM   #2
Daemon Poster
 
TibsBeatAll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 790
Default Re: Intel is not going to build a 64-bit processor

they said the same thing about dual GPUs and Nvidia.

But apparently ATI has worked around it.

Intel, no doubt, will do the same.
__________________

__________________
Athlon 64 3800+ @ 2.8 ghz.
Leadtek 6800 350/700 PCI express, different from before.
80 gig Samsung HD SATA x 2
1024 Kingston Hyperx Ram
TibsBeatAll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2005, 10:16 PM   #3
Fully Optimized
 
jack22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,124
Default Re: Intel is not going to build a 64-bit processor

intel alreayd has a 64 bit proccessor you dumb dums. It is called the itanium
__________________
Because of popular demand, the great almighty sig has been changed.



............cxxxxxxc|)::::::::::::> ................
jack22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2005, 10:16 PM   #4
Fully Optimized
 
jack22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,124
Default Re: Intel is not going to build a 64-bit processor

It has been around fer a little while.
__________________
Because of popular demand, the great almighty sig has been changed.



............cxxxxxxc|)::::::::::::> ................
jack22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2005, 10:18 PM   #5
Daemon Poster
 
TibsBeatAll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 790
Default Re: Intel is not going to build a 64-bit processor

so what was the point of this thread.
__________________
Athlon 64 3800+ @ 2.8 ghz.
Leadtek 6800 350/700 PCI express, different from before.
80 gig Samsung HD SATA x 2
1024 Kingston Hyperx Ram
TibsBeatAll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2005, 10:18 PM   #6
Daemon Poster
 
TibsBeatAll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 790
Default Re: Intel is not going to build a 64-bit processor

plague, are you like amd zen in disguise??

edit:

wow, i can't believe this. Wow.

I'm still stunned at this thread.
__________________
Athlon 64 3800+ @ 2.8 ghz.
Leadtek 6800 350/700 PCI express, different from before.
80 gig Samsung HD SATA x 2
1024 Kingston Hyperx Ram
TibsBeatAll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2005, 10:21 PM   #7
Fully Optimized
 
jack22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,124
Default Re: Intel is not going to build a 64-bit processor

plauge is a dum dum who doesnt do research
__________________
Because of popular demand, the great almighty sig has been changed.



............cxxxxxxc|)::::::::::::> ................
jack22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2005, 11:02 PM   #8
In Runtime
 
plague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 118
Default Re: Intel is not going to build a 64-bit processor

itanium is a sever processor. you can not put a server processor into a PC. That is what i am talking about. Intel will have to pay AMD to sell a 64-bit processor for a PC.
plague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-11-2005, 11:08 PM   #9
Daemon Poster
 
trance565's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 786
Send a message via AIM to trance565
Default Re: Intel is not going to build a 64-bit processor

no they wont, cuz all tehy gotta do is call it the pentimu 5, and have 64 bit tech in it, they dont use the name 64 bit at all, so the copy rite on the name dun mean shit
__________________
a64 3200+ sock 939 @2.5Ghz !!!! YES!! I DID IT!!!!!
msi k8n neo 2 plat
1 gig pc3300 ??. major brand? @ 208mhz x2...417mhz ... 17mhz over reg
radeon 9700(software says 9600) :(:( <---- pissin me off!!!
ram runs at 2-3-3-7
trance565 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-12-2005, 02:07 AM   #10
Golden Master
 
alvino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 19,967
Send a message via AIM to alvino
Default Re: Intel is not going to build a 64-bit processor

Quote:
Originally Posted by jack22
plauge is a dum dum who doesnt do research
Hey...let's not call each other names here...
__________________

alvino is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0