10-22-2008, 05:36 PM
|
#1 |
|
Beta Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1
|
intel by a little
well its intel by a little thers only way you can tell is if you really go in to heavy duty gaming intel the squars are alot smaller people think thats Graphic card a graphic card is just to make it go smooth not to look better
|
|
|
|
10-22-2008, 05:45 PM
|
#2 | |
|
Guru
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: U.S.
Posts: 7,824
|
Re: intel by a little
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
10-22-2008, 05:54 PM
|
#3 | |
|
(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 5,956
|
Re: intel by a little
Translation?
Quote:
i dont know what the squares about though...
__________________
Desktop -Cooler Master NV690/AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE/MSI 880G-E45 Motherboard/2 x 2GB DDR3 G.Skill Ripjaws X/Sapphire HD 5870 1GB GDDR5/CORSAIR CMPSU-550VX/Seagate 7200.12 500GB (OS), Samsung F3 1TB (Storage)/Sony DVD Burner/Windows 7 Professional 64-bit |
|
|
|
|
|
10-22-2008, 05:56 PM
|
#4 |
|
Guru
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: U.S.
Posts: 7,824
|
Re: intel by a little
The paragraph still doesn't make sense to me.
|
|
|
|
|
10-22-2008, 06:02 PM
|
#5 |
|
(╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: United States
Posts: 5,956
|
Re: intel by a little
i think what he means is that when Gaming, Intel CPU's are better than AMD's CPU, but by slightly. And for every other thing like daily uses, they are both the same.
While with the graphics card, people thinks that any graphics card will increase the looks of the game, but all it actually does is make the game run smoother, but doesnt improve the graphics. Im assuming he means on max settings to start off with in gaming.
__________________
Desktop -Cooler Master NV690/AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE/MSI 880G-E45 Motherboard/2 x 2GB DDR3 G.Skill Ripjaws X/Sapphire HD 5870 1GB GDDR5/CORSAIR CMPSU-550VX/Seagate 7200.12 500GB (OS), Samsung F3 1TB (Storage)/Sony DVD Burner/Windows 7 Professional 64-bit |
|
|
|
|
10-22-2008, 06:04 PM
|
#6 |
|
Guru
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: U.S.
Posts: 7,824
|
Re: intel by a little
Thank you. I agree with that thought. It was just VERY HARD to understand what he was saying. I prefer AMD processors though. Not only are they cheaper but the RAM bottleneck is lower.
|
|
|
|
|
10-23-2008, 10:01 AM
|
#7 |
|
Daemon Poster
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 810
|
Re: intel by a little
Wow. that was hard to understand. I also prefer AMD processors.
__________________
MSI K9N2GM-FIH motherboard AMD Phenom Agena 9600(2) Crucial Ballistix Tracer 1GB PC2 6400 Thermaltake 430W PSU 160GB Segate Barracuda HDD 19" Wide Screen Hanns-G Raidmax Tornado ATX Case OS- Gentoo Toshiba A135 -Vista Pentium Dual Core 1.6 ghz. 1.5gb ram www.localtechnet.net - Support me, click the ads!! |
|
|
|
|
10-24-2008, 02:10 AM
|
#8 |
|
Fully Optimized
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,752
|
Re: intel by a little
At the moment Intel is better, but AMD will soon be on top with the new AM3 socket processors, Nehalem is nothing compared to AM3
|
|
|
|
|
11-23-2008, 09:34 PM
|
#9 |
|
Solid State Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 16
|
Re: intel by a little
I think by squares he means pixels? Beats the hell out of me.....
|
|
|
|
|
11-24-2008, 03:53 AM
|
#10 | |
|
Fully Optimized
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: England
Posts: 3,388
|
Re: intel by a little
Quote:
Well Intel are in the lead by a small margin. The only way you can tell is to play a GPU stressy game. The pixels on an Intel machine are smaller. People think thats down to the graphics card. The graphics card makes it smoother, FPS, and will not make a game look better. Thats a bold statment! My view is that if your graphics ain't up to standard then get a better graphics card. And wether you run an AMD or Intel machine makes no difference at all. |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
Linear Mode
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 PM.
