Smart_Guy
Fully Optimized
- Messages
- 4,856
- Location
- Saudi Arabia
The answer is right in front of us. Performance vs prices. All we have to do is find the sweet spot in what the competitors have to offer and take it. AMD and their predecessor ATI were more for lower prices but they still beat Inter and nVidia in some points and Intel and nVidia were more for higher performance but they had stripped down performers that offered lower prices but didn't lose too much performance. That's where we should look at.
In the end the end-user should be the winner, but once they (i.e. end-users) stray from the above, they become the losers.
Let's not forget availability too. Where I live AMD CPU's/APU's are expensive because of their dealers and I don't do online shopping yet so I'm stuck with Intel. As for GPU's I'm safe. I just wish AMD make control panels with more advanced options and easier use for me like nVidia. The Crimson something CP came out wrong for my taste, unfortunately.
In the end the end-user should be the winner, but once they (i.e. end-users) stray from the above, they become the losers.
Let's not forget availability too. Where I live AMD CPU's/APU's are expensive because of their dealers and I don't do online shopping yet so I'm stuck with Intel. As for GPU's I'm safe. I just wish AMD make control panels with more advanced options and easier use for me like nVidia. The Crimson something CP came out wrong for my taste, unfortunately.