Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 04-21-2006, 05:55 PM   #11
BSOD
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 88
Default Re: Intel Celeron M 3.0GHz Beats AMD Athlon 64 FX-60

Jeeze I'm just full of misinfo today ownage. My apologies once again.

In either case, when you overclock a Conroe you'll get a much greater increase in peroformance then you would if you were to overclock on Netburst. As Netburst is 'high overclock, little performance, high voltage' and the Conroe is, 'Small overclock, high performance, little voltage. So, with this architecture, we can expect a much greater performance increase when you overclock.

An interesting thing to see will be how the K10 Architecture fairs with overclocking and power consumption.
__________________

GenoXide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2006, 05:58 PM   #12
Fully Optimized
 
ownage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,404
Default Re: Intel Celeron M 3.0GHz Beats AMD Athlon 64 FX-60

yeah, AMD is coming out with K8L which in my opinion, will just be able to keep up with Conroe. I doubt it will be a whole new architecture from stratch just like Core, K8L will probably modify the current K8 architecture to improve things while they come out with K9.
__________________

ownage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2006, 06:05 PM   #13
BSOD
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 88
Default Re: Intel Celeron M 3.0GHz Beats AMD Athlon 64 FX-60

K9 will be sweet. Hopefully we can see the true potential of the X2 series once they come out sporting that architecture. Currently the K8 architecture is dying, once Conroe and it's family hits the shelves, bye bye K8! However, when K9 comes out, it might put up a fight, or even surpass Intel. In either case, I think that the CPU industry is really going for sheer performance this time around.

With lower power consumption and much better overclocking capability then previous CPUs, things are goign to get interesting. It will be nice to see what kind of DDR2 memory will come out once AMD goes DDR2 here within the next month. What can we expect RAM frequencies to reach? 1.3Ghz? Or still at 1GHz?
GenoXide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2006, 09:02 PM   #14
Fully Optimized
 
ownage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,404
Default Re: Intel Celeron M 3.0GHz Beats AMD Athlon 64 FX-60

the max RAM frequency ive seen is DDR2-1100 using Micron D9 Fatbodies. Too bad Fatbodies are dicontinued. Elipedia chips are very nice too. Very close to D9.
__________________

ownage is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0