DarkBlade1
BSOD
- Messages
- 3,355
And now kiddies, we learn that the FX line is going dual core, and that AMD is moving into complete 90nm phase.... Intel sucks... and SOI technology is pwning Intel!
Lord Kalthorn said:You're supposed to be doing Politics at University! Thats a very blunt debating point? Simple fact is; for overclocking processors the Intel EEs have proven themselves, in the hands of as I said the only honourable Overclockers to be the best for it. Reaching speeds of 5Ghz, and above an increasing amount of times.
Again dreadfully blunt. We both know AMD and Intel are bringing out their Dual Core Processors in 2005.
Specifically in the article: '..."2005 will be a great year for Intel†because dual-core chips “are great for customersâ€...'
AMD, even FX-55s, have more than 1Meg Cache? You are so funny: Computing HQ, the first place I found in the search specifically says the FX-55 - the best processor apparently - has only 1Meg Cache.
They're not Processors, they're Budget Processors. If you want to include Sempron we can include Celeron Ds.
Intel will have four processors in two, AMD will have two in two. Hyperthreading will come into its own here - as although games for 1 processor work almost worse on 2 processors like the HT Pentiums; games writen for 2 processors, which they will be, will work better on 4 processors like the Dual HT Pentiums.
Intel Earnings up That sounds like a company loosing great masses of Market share; a company which is shit and will always be shit, and a company which is continuing to suffer huge looses.
TibsBeatAll said:ohhh,,,,,
shot down.......
nice work LK.
hehe. I'm going to upgrade at the end of this year, and see if Intel has some nice processors out.