Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 02-25-2006, 09:25 PM   #11
Fully Optimized
 
joe pic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,527
Send a message via AIM to joe pic Send a message via MSN to joe pic Send a message via Yahoo to joe pic
Default Re: Custom computer help

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamxx
Why though???

why? because they're very low end budged cpu's ...
thats why they're so cheap!
they're used most for surfing the web, word processing and whatnot...
like i said before...just because the clock speed is at 3.2 GHz, doesn't mean its really any powerful
__________________

joe pic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2006, 09:51 PM   #12
Golden Master
 
ISOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,208
Default Re: Custom computer help

Don't be fooled by pure clock speed. In most of the benchmarks, the Celeron lags big time behind the Pentium 4. The reason is the smaller L2 cache on the Celeron, which has to get by with typically, 128 kB. Not only did the Celerons have to get by with a smaller L2 cache, but their FSB clock speed was also slower. Now with the newer Celeron D, everything is much improved including the FSB. Being a simplified version of the Pentium 4 (Prescott Core), Celeron D still does not support the HyperThreading technology, which is basically a simulation of two logical processors on one single material processor. Celeron is just plain cheap...just as the phased out Durons and the newer Semprons are for AMD. It will always lag behind the Pentium 4 for that reason. Budget CPU.
__________________

__________________
*Fact: Microsoft Window's Blue Screen of Death vs Computerforums.org's White Screen of Death. Which is worse?
ISOwner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2006, 12:08 AM   #13
Fully Optimized
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,887
Default Re: Custom computer help

Ah, okay, so it basically boils down to the quality of parts used in construction and the size of the L2 cache. That's what I was asking. Thanks!
__________________

Jamxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0