JustinMcG67
BSOD
- Messages
- 2,519
There really is no comparision with dual-cores. Wether it be an X2 or a Pentium D, you really won't notice any difference at all. Sure, an X2 may finish a task 3 seconds faster, but when you're processing it and finishing it roughly 30 to 45 seconds faster then a single-core, does 3 seconds REALLY make that much of a difference?
Come on people...Let's use common sense and judgement here. An AMD X2 may be faster, but in reality, you won't notice the difference unless you had a Pentium D running right along side it. Are people really going to sit there with a stop-watch and say, "See! I beat you! I'm 5 seconds faster!" Seriously folks, when it comes to cost, the Pentium D is a better choice for those on a budget, the X2 is nice, don't get me wrong, but it's nearly $100 more, with that much extra money you could get an extra 512MB of RAM. And then that's when the performance aspect really shines...A Dual-Core CPU with 512MB more RAM, or a Dual-Core with 512MB of RAM less? Which in the long run will win?
Come on people...Let's use common sense and judgement here. An AMD X2 may be faster, but in reality, you won't notice the difference unless you had a Pentium D running right along side it. Are people really going to sit there with a stop-watch and say, "See! I beat you! I'm 5 seconds faster!" Seriously folks, when it comes to cost, the Pentium D is a better choice for those on a budget, the X2 is nice, don't get me wrong, but it's nearly $100 more, with that much extra money you could get an extra 512MB of RAM. And then that's when the performance aspect really shines...A Dual-Core CPU with 512MB more RAM, or a Dual-Core with 512MB of RAM less? Which in the long run will win?