Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Join Computer forums Today

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 03-14-2006, 01:32 AM   #41
Golden Master
MikeReiner's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,053
Send a message via AIM to MikeReiner Send a message via MSN to MikeReiner Send a message via Yahoo to MikeReiner
Default Re: Benchmark's of the quad sli!!!

Bah, no matter. It sounds better IMO :P

MikeReiner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2006, 02:15 AM   #42
HRHunteRHR's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,730
Default Re: Benchmark's of the quad sli!!!

Originally Posted by JustinMcG67

X1900XTX wins...

X1900XTX wins...

Interesting benchmark, the 7900GTX and X1900XTX lose to the 7900GT, but when comparing the X1900XTX to the 7900GTX. X1900XTX wins...

X1900XTX wins...

Hmmm....the 7900GTX loses in EVERY benchmark when compared to its competitor, the X1900XTX. So, sorry to break all your guys's hearts but, the 7900GTX loses in EVERY benchmark. Why? Because it has no new technologies when compared to the X1900XTX. It's just a 7800GTX with more memory and using way less transistors. Why do you think the thing vost so much less to make? It's because it uses so much less material then the 7800GTX 512MB.

So guys, for craps sake, accep tthe fact that the 7900GTX is just a piece of crap compared to it's predocessor, the 7800GTX 512<B, and it's competitor, the X1900XTX. It loses, flat out, in everything. So, when somethign loses that much, what can we conclude? It's a of loser. Plain and simple folks. Accept it, embrace it. And move on.

Wow saying that must take some real stubborness. The 7900 256 meg version has the best bang for your buck. 300 at my local PC Club means 250 on Newegg. I could get two, put them in SLi, and rape any 512 x1900XTx or w/e easily. Kkthx.

HRHunteRHR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2006, 07:33 AM   #43
Daemon Poster
Osak's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 821
Default Re: Benchmark's of the quad sli!!!

Originally Posted by ArrizX_MuziK
Yeah but you did mention this.. I mean here were looking at benchmakrs (CF'd and SLI'd) that we normal people will never get.

More realisticly is owning a single card of these. Their the best cards of their kind.. We would be lucky to own one. So really the bickering about the SLI and CF versions is useless.. because we will never own it.. Although the single cards performing against each other is alot more realistic for us. So thats something to argue about. And unarguably ATI wins...
ATI is indeed better for single card performance because i thas a dedicated AA AF chip but for 2 cards (SLI and crossifre) Nvidia wins. Either way both are a great company. Also the 7900gtx is on a 90 core this time, that generates less heat and that mean WAYYYY higher oc's my cars are at stock settings but im sure i could oc them much higher (Idel temp 41c load temp 55c)

Macbook Pro 2.4ghs Intel Core 2 Duo, 4gigs ram

Mac Pro - 2x 3.0GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon , 4x2gig 800MHz DDR2, 2x 1TB 7200-rpm Serial ATA 3Gb/s, NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT 512MB
Osak is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0