The answer to "THAT" question. 2007 Edition

amd processors is basically good for more peformance for a lower budget but id turn to intel for peformance cpus
 
For the price, AMD cannot be beaten by Intel. You can buy a quad core Phenom
for the price of a C2D.
 
For the price, AMD cannot be beaten by Intel. You can buy a quad core Phenom
for the price of a C2D.
yet, for like 40 bucks more you can get Phenom killer in a Q6600 or if you want an X3210 quad you can get that for like 20-30 more.
 
If AMD goes though, could an anti-trust suit follow? Just wondering since AMD and INTEL pretty much dominate the CPU market what with MAC making the switch to INTEL processors.
 
I hate threads like this. It doesn't matter they are two different processors. the bolth work well. Its a matter of what YOU like - not what other people say is "better" or "faster"

I prefer AMDs for gaming machines and graphics design

I prefer Intel for office and minor use of video/music applications

its just up to what you like to use for what.
 
Back
Top Bottom