Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 02-02-2005, 10:07 PM   #341
Golden Master
 
alvino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 19,967
Send a message via AIM to alvino
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

Athlon 64's have integratated memory contollers, to reduce latency. But, since Intel's suck, they don't.
__________________

alvino is offline  
Old 02-02-2005, 10:35 PM   #342
BSOD
 
DarkBlade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,355
Send a message via MSN to DarkBlade
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

1066MHz MAX= Intel Crap

2000MHz MAX=AMD Awesomeness.

Oh, P4's control memory using baseline commands sent to the on MOBO memory controller. It is slow and a waste of space and energy. AMD's are much more efficient. Also, you do notice the difference..... My Mom's 3.4GHz P4 w/HT cannot open all the Control Panel menus in 1.293 seconds (4.374 secs on P4), my AMD 3500+ could.... That shows something.
__________________

DarkBlade is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 12:07 AM   #343
Daemon Poster
 
trance565's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 786
Send a message via AIM to trance565
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

lol, how did u time this?
__________________
a64 3200+ sock 939 @2.5Ghz !!!! YES!! I DID IT!!!!!
msi k8n neo 2 plat
1 gig pc3300 ??. major brand? @ 208mhz x2...417mhz ... 17mhz over reg
radeon 9700(software says 9600) :(:( <---- pissin me off!!!
ram runs at 2-3-3-7
trance565 is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 12:48 PM   #344
Golden Master
 
mark thorpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,366
Send a message via MSN to mark thorpe Send a message via Yahoo to mark thorpe
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

i have an intel centrino processor and have never had any problems with it, i find it is quite fast and runs all the games that i have tried to run on it. p.s. it can open the control panel menus in that time and when doing a scan (dunno if that makes any difference!?) so i dont think that they are too bad. No flaming intended.
mark thorpe is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 01:30 PM   #345
In Runtime
 
rat_boy_100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 441
Send a message via MSN to rat_boy_100 Send a message via Yahoo to rat_boy_100
Default

AMD! AMD! AMD! Lmao, when i upgraded and took out my old mobo and celeron 766, i smashed them up and chopped the cpu into bits with sum pliers, just for the shear fun and curiosity, honest hehe
__________________
www.rbs-ofah.co.uk
Gigabyte GA-7S748-L: AMD Sempron 2800+ 2.0ghz
Viking 512mb PC3200 DDR RAM
Maxtor Plus 80gb 7200rpm
Ati Radeon 9600xt 256mb
rat_boy_100 is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 01:53 PM   #346
Guru
 
Lord Kalthorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Britain
Posts: 13,293
Send a message via MSN to Lord Kalthorn
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by alvino
Athlon 64's have integratated memory contollers, to reduce latency. But, since Intel's suck, they don't.
64s are a good deal newer in design; a lot newer - we shall see in the VIIV whether Intel use it.
__________________
A Knight is sworn to Honour. His heart knows only Virtue. His blade defends the helpless. His might upholds the Weak. His word speaks only truth. His wrath undoes the Wicked.
Lord Kalthorn is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 05:13 PM   #347
BSOD
 
DarkBlade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,355
Send a message via MSN to DarkBlade
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

Oh Lord K, Intel has to drop HT with their "dual core" VIIV..... Oooooppsssy....... Hey Lord K, the Athlon64 is newer, and the VIIV will be newer then it, but then the Toledo core bases will be newer and better then the VIIV.... HAHHA! Intel is always 1 (correction, 32bits) behind!
DarkBlade is offline  
Old 02-03-2005, 05:22 PM   #348
Guru
 
Lord Kalthorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Britain
Posts: 13,293
Send a message via MSN to Lord Kalthorn
Default

Lol; nah. Because according to the plans; the Toledo is released before the VIIV anyway. I haven't heard anything about the HT being dropped with the VIIV - I don't think it will be - doesn't make any sense to.
__________________
A Knight is sworn to Honour. His heart knows only Virtue. His blade defends the helpless. His might upholds the Weak. His word speaks only truth. His wrath undoes the Wicked.
Lord Kalthorn is offline  
Old 02-05-2005, 03:31 PM   #349
BSOD
 
DarkBlade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,355
Send a message via MSN to DarkBlade
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

They cannot do HT with dual core. The HT works by overloading the thread capabilites and adding a thread core to the chip. With two dies on each chip though, it will be impossible to accomplish HT because dual core will already be doing more threading then HT does anyway.
DarkBlade is offline  
Old 02-05-2005, 09:42 PM   #350
Golden Master
 
alvino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 19,967
Send a message via AIM to alvino
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

Either way, Intel is screwed.
__________________

alvino is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0