Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 02-01-2005, 02:55 AM   #311
Golden Master
 
alvino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 19,967
Send a message via AIM to alvino
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

LOL! Yup yup.

EDIT>>> BTW I made a "Favorite Foods" thread in the Social Lounge, where we can continue this very good convo on our favorite foods! Oh boy, I sure love food! Especially if it's FREE!!!
__________________

alvino is offline  
Old 02-01-2005, 11:55 AM   #312
Daemon Poster
 
GeforcebOY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,251
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

Intel is not a losing technoigy its not far behind AMD in most benchs . AmD kicks arse on DOOM 3 though and HL2 but! 3.8Ghz P4 is amazing if any one has used one you will know what i mean . Also this isnt AMD 64 vs Intel . The AMD XP vs P4 was just like the AMD 64 v P4. The only downside to INtel is threre price . There processors are amazing shame bout the price.
__________________

__________________
AMD FX57 - 2Gb DDR - 200Gb HDD - 512Mb X1800 XTPE - DVD Dual Layer - Creative XFi Fatality FPS - Windows Media Center 2005
3D Mark 05 : 9600
3D Mark 06 : 3800
GeforcebOY is offline  
Old 02-01-2005, 02:13 PM   #313
Guru
 
Lord Kalthorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Britain
Posts: 13,293
Send a message via MSN to Lord Kalthorn
Default

I've never actually met a Homosexual person... I know people who know some.

Lol; one day I'll work out how to realise whether I'm on the wrong page.

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeforcebOY
Intel is not a losing technoigy its not far behind AMD in most benchs . AmD kicks arse on DOOM 3 though and HL2 but! 3.8Ghz P4 is amazing if any one has used one you will know what i mean . Also this isnt AMD 64 vs Intel . The AMD XP vs P4 was just like the AMD 64 v P4. The only downside to INtel is threre price . There processors are amazing shame bout the price.
Yeah.

Have you heard anything about the VIIVs? I've seen stuff on CNet about the name and Intel pulling it up but I don't generally go on that sort of site and you do
__________________
A Knight is sworn to Honour. His heart knows only Virtue. His blade defends the helpless. His might upholds the Weak. His word speaks only truth. His wrath undoes the Wicked.
Lord Kalthorn is offline  
Old 02-01-2005, 02:59 PM   #314
BSOD
 
Giancarlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,788
Send a message via AIM to Giancarlo
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GeforcebOY
Intel is not a losing technoigy its not far behind AMD in most benchs . AmD kicks arse on DOOM 3 though and HL2 but! 3.8Ghz P4 is amazing if any one has used one you will know what i mean . Also this isnt AMD 64 vs Intel . The AMD XP vs P4 was just like the AMD 64 v P4. The only downside to INtel is threre price . There processors are amazing shame bout the price.
I highly doubt this. Intel has a lot of catching up to, despite what the walking contradiction, LK, likes to claim.
Giancarlo is offline  
Old 02-01-2005, 03:50 PM   #315
BSOD
 
DarkBlade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,355
Send a message via MSN to DarkBlade
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

HAHAHAHA!! Intel couldn't invent their way out of a cardboard box!! Besides, the new dual core AMDs are also coming out, so lets just say the 46nolhtAAthlon64 will beat the VIIV's big time..... DUmb Intel for their retarded name... WTF.. So it is the Pentium 6x4? So the Intel Pentium24 is coming out.. They need to learn how to use Roman numerals... MORONS. Besides, the integrated memory controller that AMD has will be beating Intel into the depths of Hell itself, nothing Intel makes can compete with it.
DarkBlade is offline  
Old 02-01-2005, 04:10 PM   #316
Golden Master
 
jac006's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,810
Send a message via AIM to jac006
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

those are gonna be so nice, those dual core amds! so friggen fast.
__________________
Macbook Pro and Logitech z5500s. All you really need.
jac006 is offline  
Old 02-01-2005, 04:13 PM   #317
Fully Optimized
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,438
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

Yea they should learn roman numerals!
__________________
Just A Guy With A Voice In His Head...
Charchris is offline  
Old 02-01-2005, 04:31 PM   #318
BSOD
 
DarkBlade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,355
Send a message via MSN to DarkBlade
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

Well, not only will the AMD Dual cores be fast (core clock wise) they will have a 2.4GHz FourWay HyperThreading Integrated Controller set on the processor board. Also, an AI Integrated Memory controller will make it twice as fast at accessing memory banks, and they will be able to use DDR2 as well in early 2006. Not only that, but they will be powerful. Possibly pushing on the mutli billion calculation per second lines.

Oh, and for Lord K... P4 dual core will SUCK!! Smithfield core is no more then two P4s slapped together to make a "dual core" setup. AMD has actaully planned this from the start. That is where the Hammer series came into play. If you realized that the Hammer core has a 2 way, bi direction interface core, then that would make one assume that AMD was intending it for dual core. The Clawhammer core (now called Toledo) will be interfaced with that single integrated memory controller and quad Hyperthreading controllers (two per die) it will be UNSTOPPABLE. Intel are fools!! They actually believe that a simple access to that crappy DDR2 memory with baseline command will beat the low latency DDR1 and the integrated memory controller from AMD? HAHAHAHAHH!!!! WTF... Intel is still stuck in 32bit in a 64bit world. The Smithfield will suck, and it will be destroyed (Hammered to death) by the Hammer series cores. AMD are ingenius! If you actaully think for one second that Intel was going to beat the dual core hammer series, you were SADLY mistaken. Integrated low latency memory controller and 2.4GHZ FSB will allow AMD to conquer Intel (yet again) and the Opteron, Sempron, FX series, and Athlon64 are all going dual core by Q3 2006. Intel is doomed.
DarkBlade is offline  
Old 02-01-2005, 04:41 PM   #319
BSOD
 
DarkBlade's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,355
Send a message via MSN to DarkBlade
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

TAKE THIS INTEL!! Smithfield has nothing on these stats!

AMD Toledo

Introduced: 2005-Q3

Description: Desktop Athlon 64 FX chip with dual cores.

* x80:2400 MHz, 1.35V, 80A, 95W, 67C
* x75:2200 MHz, 1.35V, 80A, 95W, 67C
* x75:2200 MHz, 1.15V, 48A, 55W, 71C
* x70:2000 MHz, 1.15V, 48A, 55W, 71C
* x60:1600 MHz, 1.10V, 30A, 30W, 71C
DarkBlade is offline  
Old 02-01-2005, 05:38 PM   #320
BSOD
 
Giancarlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,788
Send a message via AIM to Giancarlo
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

AMD is very aggressive...
__________________

Giancarlo is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0