Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 01-20-2005, 09:53 PM   #21
Daemon Poster
 
trance565's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 786
Send a message via AIM to trance565
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

ok so .... if amd fsb is faster than intell, how does that not help? i thot ht was the 800 fsb
__________________

__________________
a64 3200+ sock 939 @2.5Ghz !!!! YES!! I DID IT!!!!!
msi k8n neo 2 plat
1 gig pc3300 ??. major brand? @ 208mhz x2...417mhz ... 17mhz over reg
radeon 9700(software says 9600) :(:( <---- pissin me off!!!
ram runs at 2-3-3-7
trance565 is offline  
Old 01-21-2005, 12:10 AM   #22
In Runtime
 
blah blah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 359
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

ya but amd is better for gaming and is limited on 32-bit apps, and thats when a top of the line intel processor EE HT will multitask its way faster than an amd

mentioned a thousand times, no arguement both are good:
AMD=gaming
Intel=multitasking and some visual design apps
__________________

__________________
-AMD 64- FX55- 1mb L2 cache 2.6 ghz
-MSI K8N Neo4 Platinum SLI NVIDIA nForce4 SLI mobo
-2 Leadtek nVIDIA GeForce 6800 Ultra 256MB GDDR3 256-PCI-E
-Crucial Ballistix 2GB DDR400 PC3200 at 450Mhz OC'ed
14,500 3d-mark03' score
blah blah is offline  
Old 01-21-2005, 03:50 AM   #23
BSOD
 
Giancarlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,788
Send a message via AIM to Giancarlo
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

AMD is way faster in 90% of respects compared to the best Intel P4 EE CPUs, and not to mention it is cheaper. AMD will continue to dominate future ground in the processer market. And people keep bringing up multitasking.. what the heck? AMD does just fine in multitasking, and I think just as good as any Intel processor And some visual design apps? You want me to bring up benchmarks showing how that is not true? AMD does far better then just in gaming. Don't minimize their accomplishments, people.

AMD does better in 32-bit applications then Intel does. And Intel's top P4 is a joke compared to the AMD's top 64-bit processor.

And Apple... hahahah... don't even need to discuss the slowness of that one. Slower then celerons.
Giancarlo is offline  
Old 01-21-2005, 04:16 AM   #24
Baseband Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 28
Default

Anything AMD can do, Intel can do better and that's why Intel get's my vote.
Stylez is offline  
Old 01-21-2005, 04:27 AM   #25
Fully Optimized
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,438
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

I've got a friend that thinks Intel is better and ttold me to come up with 20 reasons.... i don't think he can come up with 1 for Intel
__________________
Just A Guy With A Voice In His Head...
Charchris is offline  
Old 01-21-2005, 08:50 AM   #26
Baseband Member
 
joeyw368's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 57
Send a message via AIM to joeyw368
Thumbs up

In my dads computer we have an intel P4 2.4GHz and it sux for multi-tasking. Im building a gaming pc and im goin wit amd 3800 processor!!! So.....................................AMD all the way!!!!!!!!!!
joeyw368 is offline  
Old 01-21-2005, 11:18 AM   #27
In Runtime
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 223
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

my p43.2 is faster than my amd 3000+ so im goin with intel
rymort is offline  
Old 01-21-2005, 01:01 PM   #28
BSOD
 
Giancarlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,788
Send a message via AIM to Giancarlo
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stylez
Anything AMD can do, Intel can do better and that's why Intel get's my vote.
Prove it. That's wrong for several reasons I've already stated. AMD does everything better then Intel in almost every regard.
Giancarlo is offline  
Old 01-21-2005, 01:02 PM   #29
BSOD
 
Giancarlo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 4,788
Send a message via AIM to Giancarlo
Default Re: AMD vs Intel vs Apple (NO FLAMING!!!!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by rymort
my p43.2 is faster than my amd 3000+ so im goin with intel
My AMD 64 3000+ is 10% faster then P4 3.2GHz.. maybe you are comparing computers with different components in them.
Giancarlo is offline  
Old 01-21-2005, 02:57 PM   #30
Guru
 
Lord Kalthorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Britain
Posts: 13,293
Send a message via MSN to Lord Kalthorn
Default

We're still comparing 64-bit Processors to 32-bit Processors. Its not excuse for Intel not having a 64-bit Processor out but the only real test will be when the two have 64-bit and Dual chips; and not one with an advantage on games, and the other with a disadvantage on games; that apparently being the only reason anybody buys a PC recently... which is of course a dreadful thing.

Intel's Research and prior knowledge - along with lessons learnt from the AMD64s and from the Itanium2s with HP and the Pentium Prescotts will make Intel get ahead once more - and AMD will have to make up for their inadequate Headquarters through Flash Memory.
__________________

__________________
A Knight is sworn to Honour. His heart knows only Virtue. His blade defends the helpless. His might upholds the Weak. His word speaks only truth. His wrath undoes the Wicked.
Lord Kalthorn is offline  
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0