Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 06-07-2007, 04:01 PM   #171
Baseband Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 52
Default Re: AMD or Intel

I have only owned Intell so I have to say Intell all the way so far..
__________________

__________________
www.yawoop.com
bbrian017 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2007, 02:00 AM   #172
In Runtime
 
PCdude1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 120
Cool Re: AMD or Intel

Quote:
Originally Posted by ISOwner View Post
I like whichever one's faster. I've used AMD because it was first to use 64-bit, and proven faster than Intel. Now, Intel looks to be coming out with good stuff. So I'm going to say AMD still because they're pretty much the same as of now. Core Duo looks good but don't see any outstanding specs or benchmarks on it. Unless someone can show me otherwise.
Intel is faster than AMD i saw some reviews. and the core 2 duo beats the AMD 64x2 so im going with intel
__________________

PCdude1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2007, 10:53 PM   #173
Daemon Poster
 
NEED WOW NOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,315
Send a message via AIM to NEED WOW NOW
Default Re: AMD or Intel

I went for Intel mainly because of there speed. AMD is nice and reliable but is slower.
NEED WOW NOW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 11:32 PM   #174
In Runtime
 
CGfreak102's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 475
Default Re: AMD or Intel

welli have always loved AMD, but i havent had the chance to get a comp wit the proc, bc i have had only one comp, yes rite now Intel does have the advantage, bc of the core 2 duo, but ova this summer AMD should be releasing a new Proc, called AMD Phenom all it says(PC world) is it a 65nm proc, and then goes on to say Intel plans of countering this wit Intel Penryn(Q1, 2008), it says they are already running over 3GHz, wit good gains over the Core 2 Duo in gamming and Viedo editing, and it will b a 45nm build with newer high-k metal gates.

so just a lil scope of wut is new to come,

go AMD
__________________
Core I7 920 OC'ed to 3.0Ghz, 6GB G.skill DDR3 1333, Intel DX58SO, 500GB seagate 7200RPM + 320GB seagate, EVGA 9800GTX+ , 600W PSU.
CGfreak102 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2007, 12:19 AM   #175
Daemon Poster
 
NEED WOW NOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,315
Send a message via AIM to NEED WOW NOW
Default Re: AMD or Intel

Yea WHEN IS Q1,2,3 and 4
I did a little reseach and found these link with a some info regarding the AMD Phenom processors. I just want to no the price
__________________
AMD is Happy!
Intel is Pissed!
Europe is $1.45 Billion Dollar's Richer!
NEED WOW NOW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2007, 01:24 AM   #176
In Runtime
 
CGfreak102's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 475
Default Re: AMD or Intel

Quote:
Originally Posted by NEED WOW NOW View Post
Yea WHEN IS Q1,2,3 and 4
I did a little reseach and found these link with a some info regarding the AMD Phenom processors. I just want to no the price
ummmmmm Q1 stands for quarter 1 as in the first 3 months of the year, or for the simple ppl, jan, feb, mar.

and idk price, i was also interested in tht
__________________
Core I7 920 OC'ed to 3.0Ghz, 6GB G.skill DDR3 1333, Intel DX58SO, 500GB seagate 7200RPM + 320GB seagate, EVGA 9800GTX+ , 600W PSU.
CGfreak102 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2007, 02:07 AM   #177
Daemon Poster
 
NEED WOW NOW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,315
Send a message via AIM to NEED WOW NOW
Default Re: AMD or Intel

well here is the link and here is the picture
http://www.dailytech.com/Final+AMD+S...hardware.co.uk


I HOPE THE QUAD CORES COME OUT IN EARLY JULY

And i am really interested in the price because the quad cores are usually Expensive. If AMD found a way to Produce Quad cores cheaply GOOOO AMD
__________________
AMD is Happy!
Intel is Pissed!
Europe is $1.45 Billion Dollar's Richer!
NEED WOW NOW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-26-2007, 03:18 AM   #178
Golden Master
 
alvino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 19,967
Send a message via AIM to alvino
Default Re: AMD or Intel

I'm waiting for Phenom (what's with the stupid names?) before I upgrade so I have a clear comparison between it and Core 2 Duo.
alvino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2007, 02:59 AM   #179
Golden Master
 
ISOwner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,208
Default Re: AMD or Intel

Yes, we need to get this thread updated!!!!!! Since it's a sticky anyways........

Does AMD have what it takes to get back in the hunt with Intel? AMD hasn't had a competitive high end product since Intel launched its Core 2 Duo processors in July of 06. They need to ditch the old K8 architecture. And something new is just that: AMD's new K10 architecture powering server chips (Barcelona) as well as new desktop chips (Agena).

But also, the Athlon name is DEAD. Enter the new top of the line CPU called Phenom.

AMD says Phenom will ship in dual and quad core flavors. A key advantage of the quad core Phenom is that all four cores are on one die. Intel's current quad CPUs are essentially two dual cores linked by a frontside bus. Seems like deja vu when the Athlon 64 first came out going up against Intel Pentium 4 and Pentium D. This is interesting..............

AMD's approach certainly seems like a real eye opener, but we'll see whether the new design is really a plus until we see test results. Meanwhile, for the truly hard core users, a new platform, code named FASN8, that supports two quad core Phenoms are in the mix of things.

Intel isn't staying quiet: The company will soon launch its next desktop chip, a Penryn family member code named Yorkfield. Based on an updated version of the Core 2 Duo architecture, these quad core chips will feature improvements such as larger cache sizes and new SSE instructions. So big updates are coming and things are starting to heat up once again.
__________________
*Fact: Microsoft Window's Blue Screen of Death vs Computerforums.org's White Screen of Death. Which is worse?
ISOwner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2007, 04:16 AM   #180
In Runtime
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 446
Send a message via MSN to Comp_Pro
Default Re: AMD or Intel

AMD is better, faster more powerefficent. my AMD 64 athlon X2 Dual Core Processor 4000+ is better than my brothers Intel Celeron 2.8ghz. mines only 2.1!
__________________

__________________
Intel i7 4770k 3.50ghz, 32gb Corsair Vengeance RAM (8x4 kit), 2 x 2TB WD Black HHD, nVidia 770GTX 4gb OC, Asus Z87-A Motherboard, running Windows 7 64 bit.
Comp_Pro is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0