|
|
#1 |
|
Baseband Member
|
Simple as this what company do you like better. AMD or Intel, doesnt matter in what catorgory just overall what you like better
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
BSOD
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,076
|
look at my avatar
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Fully Optimized
|
I'm not bias of either, just whatever one has faster processors out. Right now I like intel more just because they have conroe comming which is going to be awesome.
__________________
The Amish computer: AMD Opteron 165 CCBWE 0551@ 2.25ghz(250 x 9) 1.45v cooled w/ Thermaltake Big Typhoon | DFI LP Ultra D | eVGA 7800GT@ 465/1110 | Sound Blaster X-Fi XtremeMusic | 2GB G. Skill DDR 500 @ 250mhz 3-4-4-8 | 80 GB SATA + 40GB SATA + 200GB IDE| 480w Thermaltake Silent purepower | Thermaltake Tsunami Dream case (Black) | Windows XP Pro | |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Baseband Member
|
What is so good about conroe could you give me an article or something to read about it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Daemon Poster
|
i said amd, b/c i like the simplicity in memory controller/northbridge.
its much easier to tell which board uses CFire/SLI with AMD boards. i like amd's integrated memory controller because it makes fsb much less confusing. lol. there's less multipliers/dividers/etc. lol. i guess i could learn intel's ways, but im too lazy.
__________________
ATHLON64 3200+ @ 2.2Ghz AM2. 2 x 512mb OCZ 800mhz ddr2 ram. EVGA 7600GT KO. myspace.com/badninja3 |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
CF Privileged
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 12,226
|
I like whichever one's faster. I've used AMD because it was first to use 64-bit, and proven faster than Intel. Now, Intel looks to be coming out with good stuff. So I'm going to say AMD still because they're pretty much the same as of now. Core Duo looks good but don't see any outstanding specs or benchmarks on it. Unless someone can show me otherwise.
__________________
*Fact: Microsoft Window's Blue Screen of Death vs Computerforums.org's White Screen of Death. Which is worse? |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Golden Master
|
We need an "Ultimante Thread: AMD vs. Intel!"
Lol, ![]() Intel, just because ive used my friends Amd, and it blew, and its supposed to compete with my intel, yeah right.
__________________
. ()()()() ./l ,[_\_\ ], l---L – ()lllllll()- ()_) ()_)--o-)_) |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
CF Privileged
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,404
|
Intel, Conroe mainly, but im looking forward to Woodcrest blowing the opteron out of the water
But Intels are easier to work with. The memory dividers are very simple. 1:2, 2:3, 4:5. AMDs are more annoying to work with.
__________________
If anybody needs anything from me. PM me. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Daemon Poster
|
lol, look at the poll. lol, how the tables have turned over the past year. Guessing theres not as many fan boys here as I originally thought.
__________________
Delta: "What's wrong Chris?? Chris: "I miss my old Cyrix" |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
BSOD
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 41
|
cant decide, right now amd is better imo but ill make my choice when conroe comes out
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|