Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 10-02-2005, 12:03 AM   #31
Fully Optimized
ownage's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,404
Default Re: AMD or Intel

Originally Posted by acphenom
VIA's C7-M's 0.1W idle kills Pentium M's 0.5. :P

No, but damn, 0.5 is good.

Anyway, don't matter about the old cores, cause all the...'mainstream' P4's and PD's are the ones which most people will buy.

And alvino, I've seen the Sempron 3400+ beat Venice 3000 in many tasks, and they come close to 3200, so they aren't exactly owned. Of course, memory bandwidth is a different story...
HAHA, the sempron 3400+ will beat the 3000+ venice AT STOCK SETTINGS. but, do you know what the 3000+ venice is capable of? Guess not, ill show you...it will overclock to 2.7 ON AIR. yes, thats 300HTT times the 9 multiplier that it has it will go to 2.9 on water. Thats is basically getting a FX-57 for 900 dollars yet. The L2 cache only give you a maximum of 5 fps while gaming.

ownage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-02-2005, 01:09 AM   #32
Golden Master
alvino's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 19,967
Send a message via AIM to alvino
Default Re: AMD or Intel

The power of the Venice core...

The Palermo is decent at stock, but it leaves much to be desired.

alvino is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:09 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0