Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 03-19-2005, 01:26 PM   #21
Baseband Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 24
Default Re: AMD 64bit questionS!

o so i should get a amd 64 3000+ winnie n it'll overclock to the same speed as an 3200+ or 3500+
__________________

ccbl91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005, 01:31 PM   #22
Fully Optimized
 
jack22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,124
Default Re: AMD 64bit questionS!

Yep. But lookingback, the 3200+ is OC'ng very well to.
__________________

__________________
Because of popular demand, the great almighty sig has been changed.



............cxxxxxxc|)::::::::::::> ................
jack22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005, 01:44 PM   #23
Daemon Poster
 
prosser13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,080
Send a message via MSN to prosser13
Default Re: AMD 64bit questionS!

KK money_man here are the 754 results. These are overclocked, if you want the normal results for either socket again just ask.

CD Ripping - 3000+ 1.30 3200+ 1.36
MPEG-2 encoding - 3000+ 1.30 3200+ 1.30
Image Editing - 3000+ 1.58 3200+ 1.63
Overall - 3000+ 1.40 3200+ 1.44
Doom 3 - 67.7fps 3200+ 67.6fps
PiFast (lower is better) - 3000+ 51.40 3200+ 51.30

AS you can see, the 3200+ actually with overclock further than on the 3000+ on the 754 platform. All the processor were overclocked with their stock coolers until they would not run stabley.

And also, I have just glanced over and it seems the overclocked 939 3000+ will beat both the 3000+ and the 3200+ (overclocked) on the 754, so GET THE NEW ONE!
__________________
If I help you, I welcome Reputation Points to show your thanks. I won't forget it!
prosser13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005, 01:46 PM   #24
Fully Optimized
 
jack22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,124
Default Re: AMD 64bit questionS!

That doesnt really say anything. it shows how they preformed. Im talking about acctual OC's.
__________________
Because of popular demand, the great almighty sig has been changed.



............cxxxxxxc|)::::::::::::> ................
jack22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005, 02:25 PM   #25
Baseband Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 24
Default Re: AMD 64bit questionS!

*cry* jack ur confusing me. lolz
which one, 3000 or 3200 can i get higher GHz if i oc?
ccbl91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005, 02:29 PM   #26
Daemon Poster
 
prosser13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,080
Send a message via MSN to prosser13
Default Re: AMD 64bit questionS!

And what I'd say is, if the 3000+ 939 is performing better than it is most probable that it gets a higher GHz than the 3200+ 939. It is impossible to compare the GHz cross platform though, as they started on different levels.

Anyway, why does the GHz matter, isn't the the performence? I wouldn't care if I was running a AMD FX-55 at 1MHz if it was performing better than at 3000GHz.
__________________
If I help you, I welcome Reputation Points to show your thanks. I won't forget it!
prosser13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005, 02:30 PM   #27
Fully Optimized
 
jack22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,124
Default Re: AMD 64bit questionS!

Ok. GHz is like 3.2GHz. Mzh is like 3200 which equals 3.2GHz. All it means is speed. Now it really depends. I would check out OCforums.com for more information on this. Just post a topic there about it.
__________________
Because of popular demand, the great almighty sig has been changed.



............cxxxxxxc|)::::::::::::> ................
jack22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005, 10:55 PM   #28
Solid State Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 6
Default

hey man i am in the same situation you are in looking at the same products you are. I would say dont go for it. If you allready have a computer that runs good and will play your games...keep it. I decided to keep my 2600+ until the 64bit world is a little more advanced and actually has 64 bit apps. Hope i could help
Chubbz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-19-2005, 11:23 PM   #29
Baseband Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 24
Default

wait till venice cores
ccbl91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-20-2005, 04:59 AM   #30
Daemon Poster
 
prosser13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,080
Send a message via MSN to prosser13
Default Re: AMD 64bit questionS!

jack22 ur wrong. A Socket 939 3200+ DOES NOT run at 3.2GHz, it runs at 2.0GHz. A Socket 939 3000+ runs at 1.8GHz. A Socket 754 3200+ runs at 2.2GHz and on the same platform a 3000+ runs at 2.0GHz.

The 939 3000+ is better and faster than the 754 3000+ because it has dual channel memory. If you're going to give out information, make sure it's right!
__________________

__________________
If I help you, I welcome Reputation Points to show your thanks. I won't forget it!
prosser13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0