L Locomuy Baseband Member Messages 67 Nov 9, 2007 #1 So which is the better bang for the buck? And, with sli would 2 8800gt's smoke a 8800gtz? This is for gaming.
So which is the better bang for the buck? And, with sli would 2 8800gt's smoke a 8800gtz? This is for gaming.
OP OP L Locomuy Baseband Member Messages 67 Nov 9, 2007 #3 Oh and what proccesor would be the best to go with one, I'm thinking a amd 64.
OP OP L Locomuy Baseband Member Messages 67 Nov 9, 2007 #5 i don think i want a quad core.. just a fast dual core.
Celegorm Site Team Staff member Messages 11,741 Location USA Nov 9, 2007 #8 Pyrox920 said: Get an Intel Q6600. Click to expand... That is probally the first processor that wouldn't bottleneck a 8800. An E6750 might not either, but anything else would.
Pyrox920 said: Get an Intel Q6600. Click to expand... That is probally the first processor that wouldn't bottleneck a 8800. An E6750 might not either, but anything else would.
à Äߧý∩†H♠H䎀 Fully Optimized Messages 3,629 Nov 9, 2007 #9 Any core2duo that you can get to overclock to roughly 3.2Ghz-3.3Ghz will not bottleneck a GTX. A E6750 or Q6600 not overclocked is a bottleneck. You need to overclock them to allow them to work at there full potential.
Any core2duo that you can get to overclock to roughly 3.2Ghz-3.3Ghz will not bottleneck a GTX. A E6750 or Q6600 not overclocked is a bottleneck. You need to overclock them to allow them to work at there full potential.
esa193 Fully Optimized Messages 4,210 Nov 9, 2007 #10 not quad quad core doesnt need a o/c to not bottle neck