Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 05-07-2007, 09:50 PM   #21
Golden Master
 
freestyler105's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7,883
Default Re: 4200+ X2 Destroys Conroe E6600

Quote:
Originally Posted by hascet View Post
Ya me to my best time for the 1M I think is 13 sec. I think freestyler also got this or maybe he did better I can't remember...
Yep, I got something like that. I've been meaning to try to push it farther, but I've been really busy lately..
__________________

__________________
C2D E6600 | 4GB DDR2-800 | 9800GTX+ | Asus P5B-E | 150GB Raptor | 320GB 7200.10 | 750W Xigmatek PSU
freestyler105 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 09:52 PM   #22
Fully Optimized
 
hascet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,218
Default Re: 4200+ X2 Destroys Conroe E6600

^lol
In case your to lazy here is the 3dMark 06 cpu score
__________________

__________________
www.crazycomputers.org
hascet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2007, 10:06 PM   #23
Fully Optimized
 
ownage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,404
Default Re: 4200+ X2 Destroys Conroe E6600

Quote:
Originally Posted by celegorm View Post
what i'd like to see is super Pi what ever it's called run on both systems since that is a mesure of almost only proc intensive.
super pi is not all cpu power. You can have a cpu run at 5Ghz and memory run at 100mhz and the performance will be horrible. Super pi is all about memory speed and timings (primary and secondary timings) along with processor speed and efficiency at executing the instructions.
ownage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2007, 02:04 AM   #24
Golden Master
 
MikeReiner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,053
Send a message via AIM to MikeReiner Send a message via MSN to MikeReiner Send a message via Yahoo to MikeReiner
Default Re: 4200+ X2 Destroys Conroe E6600

Sorry AMDpwnz0r, but core 2 duo owns AMD's ass up and down the street for now.
MikeReiner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2007, 02:07 AM   #25
Fully Optimized
 
NeXuS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,960
Default Re: 4200+ X2 Destroys Conroe E6600

Yeap im not being a fan boy but I liked AMD but now I went whats best right now and I am happy with my C2D.
__________________
//Antec 902 V3 Case, Intel i7-2600K (@4.5GHz 1.280V watercooled w/ Antec H2O Kuhler 920), 8GB DDR3 Corsair Vengeance 1866MHz, ASUS P8P67 PRO B3, MSI 3GB N580 GTX Lightning Xtreme (@850MHz/2100MHz), 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3, Corsair HX850W Pro Series//
//XPS 410 C2D E6400 @ 2.13GHz, 2GB DDR2 667MHz, 250GB HD, eVGA 320mb 8800GTS(605/1900MHz)//
//AMD Athlon XP +2000, Socket A MSI-6390, 768 mb of PC 2100 RAM, AGP ATI RADEON 9600SE//

I <3 TrancE
NeXuS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2007, 09:44 PM   #26
Daemon Poster
 
connchri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 1,019
Send a message via MSN to connchri
Default Re: 4200+ X2 Destroys Conroe E6600

And that's a stock speeds. You have to remember, a Core 2 Duo overclocks far better than a Athlon 64. Look at my sig, I'd like to see your 4200 x2 keep up with that!

Just did a quick benchmark using SiSandra 2007.5.11.35. My "puney" E4300 is currently clocked at 3.15GHz because of new memory that I've not quite pushed it back to the limit yet.

Dhrystone ALU 25195 MIPS
Whetstone iSSE3 19178 MFLOPS
Integer x8 iSSSE3 : 170819 it/s
Float x8 iSSE2 : 131704 it/s

Lol, let me know how your 4200x2 gets on, because as far as Toms' hardware goes, and SiSandra's comparison results go, there's not an AMD there to keep up with it. Not bad for 90.

Now if you'd be so kind to post your results for CPU marks only, I'll download 3dMark tommorow and give you my results.
__________________
Delta: "What's wrong Chris?? Chris: "I miss my old Cyrix"
connchri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2007, 11:38 PM   #27
Fully Optimized
 
ownage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,404
Default Re: 4200+ X2 Destroys Conroe E6600

LOL. connchri, if you are so confident that the Core 2 Duo will win at everything...compare memory bandwidth with the A64 X2. That is one place where the Core 2 Duo will get whipped. The Core 2 Duo has less memory bandwidth than the Netburst processors.
ownage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 04:55 AM   #28
In Runtime
 
AMDpwnz0r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 122
Default Re: 4200+ X2 Destroys Conroe E6600

You guys are taking this post in the wrong direction.

This was never meant to be a " LOL AMD PWNS INTEL!!!!111oneonetwo" topic.


I was just looking for answers as to why my 3Dmark06 scores are better than his, (yes even before my other 2 gigs of ram) I know his processor owns mine by a long shot. So thats why i was wondering even if his card was clocked a little lower than mine, wouldn't the score still be higher or a little closer to mine because of his godly cpu? ESPECIALLY since it is clocked from 2.4 to 3.19 ( at the time of the score i posted my processor was at stock speeds)


As far as the pictures i haven't gotten any yet. My friend has seem them he was there when i took the test. He is stumped.

You say you don't believe me. Why would I try to "impress" you people that i don't even know, on some forum I care so little about? My score is the same as it always has been. 3494
__________________
-AMDpwnz0r Rig-
AMD 9950BE PhenomX4 @ 3.1Ghz |HIS 4870 1Gb (790/1070) |160Gb WesternDigital|4GB G.Skill (pc2 8000)|ASUS M3A78-T |Corsair 750TX PSU|Antec Nine Hundred Case|Zalman 8700NT CPU Cooler|G15 Gaming keyboard|G5 Gaming mouse|
AMDpwnz0r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 06:53 AM   #29
Daemon Poster
 
connchri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 1,019
Send a message via MSN to connchri
Default Re: 4200+ X2 Destroys Conroe E6600

Quote:
Originally Posted by ownage View Post
LOL. connchri, if you are so confident that the Core 2 Duo will win at everything...compare memory bandwidth with the A64 X2. That is one place where the Core 2 Duo will get whipped. The Core 2 Duo has less memory bandwidth than the Netburst processors.
http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.ht...=479&chart=163

Yes, the AMD does have higher bandwidth. I'm still confident my 90 Core 2 Duo is the better CPU across the board compared to any even double the price, is somecases any AMD CPU.

RAM Bandwidth Integer 5940MB/s
RAM Bandwidth Float 5944MB/s

Correction, the Netburst architecture does not have higher memory bandwidth in comparision with the majority of the C2D. Indeed, most of the C2D have greater bandwidth than the P4's.

Just like the NetBurst architecture, the super high Memory Bandwidth doesn't make it a great CPU. LOL, or the AMD would never had always been the performance king over the P4 Era if that were the case. The P4 always had far greater memory bandwidth, but never quite cut it.

The same goes for the Athlon 64's. AMD is now concentrating selling A64's on the integrated memory controller spin that it's easy to overlook that the rest of the architecture is simply not up to the performance of the compitition. You now get 3GHz A64's and there running hot now, again, AMD are trying to squeeze every bit of clock out them now. Even with Windsors far higher memory bandwidth, the C2D kills it in all other benchmarks and real life programs.

http://www23.tomshardware.com/cpu.ht...=479&chart=163

Only the Windsor core A64's have greater memory bandwidth.

AMDPwn0r, appologies for the somewhat "brute" and straight to the point post of mine, but considering the title of the thread, your username and you forgiving the AMD system so easily for having 2GB of extra memory, I initially took you as a AMD fanboy, hence my reply.

What core of A64 x2 4200 are you using anyway?
__________________
Delta: "What's wrong Chris?? Chris: "I miss my old Cyrix"
connchri is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2007, 12:51 PM   #30
Golden Master
 
alvino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 19,967
Send a message via AIM to alvino
Default Re: 4200+ X2 Destroys Conroe E6600

Yeah, tests will usually vary. Don't just run it once and think that the score is set in stone. Do a clean install with both systems using the same hardware, or comparably the same hardware and do several tests.
__________________

alvino is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0