Go Back   Computer Forums > General Computing > Hardware
Click Here to Login
Join Computer forums Today


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 
Old 02-28-2011, 10:01 AM   #11
Fully Optimized
 
~Darkseeker~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom
Posts: 2,494
Default Re: 2011 MacBook Pro - Lolfail?

you also should consider how well an item holds it's value.

for instance, people have offered me £200-300 for my old PowerPC G4, and it's nearly 7 years old.
__________________

__________________
EVGA SLI Micro Z68 // Intel i5-2500k @ 4.4GHz // 8GB Corsair Vengeance 1866MHz // Overclocked ASUS GTX 660 Ti // Corsair Carbide SPEC-03 // Kingston Hyper-X 120GB // 2TB WD Green + 500GB WD Black
#JC4PM
~Darkseeker~ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2011, 07:01 PM   #12
Golden Master
 
01001010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,888
Default Re: 2011 MacBook Pro - Lolfail?

Quote:
Originally Posted by root View Post
in what world are mac books competativly priced?
Compare other premium notebooks to the MacBook.


Quote:
Originally Posted by root View Post
(and yes it was a mac book pro, not just the standard mac book).
the trouble was the atom processor.
You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. The MacBook Pro never came with an Intel Atom processor. That alone dismisses your whole argument. Especially when my 2007 MacBook Pro still runs everything with relative ease.
__________________

__________________
Stop the genocide now.
↳ www.savedarfur.org

Send comments, suggestions and criticisms.
↳ 01001010listens@gmail.com
01001010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 03:43 AM   #13
Site Team
 
root's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,999
Default Re: 2011 MacBook Pro - Lolfail?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 01001010 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by root View Post
in what world are mac books competativly priced?
Compare other premium notebooks to the MacBook.
do I really have to explain this in such little baby steps for you.

Yes, compared to other *premium* notepads/notbooks/laptops etc the mac book pro IS competitively prices.

for example to top end of [insert other suppler here] range is prices around the same as a mac book pro.

BUT, the mac book pro, in general appears to have slower processor/less/ram/worse GPU. -and if you're truly honest, still has less possible applications (though how much that affects you does depend on what you're doing).


to just say that it's priced the same as other high end laptops is silly.

it's extraordinarily well priced (as the top of the range) when compared to a top of the range car (which has a much more basic computer. or a top of the line champagne...

but those comparisons are meaningless, all that matters is how much bang for your buck you're getting. and it's still the case that you get more when buying a PC.


This whole thread is about the fact that Apple have just stuck a midrange GPU into the new macbook pro.
it's meant to be their top of the line, meant to be their showing everyone how much at the bleeding edge of design and innovation they are. so why the only par graphics card? -yet still the price tag of a box stuffed with the latest and greatest.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 01001010 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by root View Post
(and yes it was a mac book pro, not just the standard mac book).
the trouble was the atom processor.
You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. The MacBook Pro never came with an Intel Atom processor. That alone dismisses your whole argument. Especially when my 2007 MacBook Pro still runs everything with relative ease.
no. that was an editing/proof reading fail.

I had written a much longer more rambling post, and didn't quite edit all of it out. -edited it now, does that make you happy?

the fact still stands.

I said at the start of the post I didn't own a mac at all.
I quoted directly what had been told me by a friend whom I trust.
(even if I had meant to write that it wouldn't have dismissed an anecdotal argument).

he bought a mac book pro. when it first arrived he absolutely loved it. but soon found that it just wasn't good enough. in his exact words the processor wasn't up to it. when he was using skype the processor usage was sitting at 80-90% leaving practically nothing to do anything else.

you can accuse me of being Anti-Mac if you like.
but the guy who I got the information from to form this opinion isn't, he bought a Mac to start with, found out that it was woefully under powered and upgraded it to the current mac book air.

that said, an alternative experience could be gathered from my house mate, who has a mac book. or my ex, who also has a mac book.

both of them have the older gen mac book (white plastic). both of them love it. it does what they want, and they work in the way that it wants them to.

so perhaps if you're a standard user you can have a mac book and everything is great, for a few years or more even.
but that doesn't change the fact that if you are a pro user (like my friend is), who wants to run a lot of apps, or a lot of possibly resource intensive apps then the macbook pro possibly isn't for you.

and yes I find it laughable that his reasonably current macbook pro couldn't use safari and skype (with video) at the same time, because even the most basic PC can do that. (perhaps that's an exaggeration, but if it is, it's his exaggeration, I'm just repeating it verbatim)

perhaps you use your mac the same as my house-mate uses his. (e.g not intensively), perhaps you're happy with it. it doesn't change the fact that I know someone who wasn't happy with a mac, (yet at the same time still liked the brand and still bought another mac to replace it).


Telling me I have "absolutely no idea" what I'm talking about is just a little silly.
it also doesn't change the fact that this thread is about people saying that
putting substandard hardware in the box is silly (especially given the price tag)
substandard hardware doesn't justify a premium price tag.
you don't have to be Einstein to figure that out,
especially since I can read the specs myself and form an opinion about the hardware


Bear in mind one more thing. my opinion on the cost of the hardware is based on the GBP (sterling prices).
it seems that nobody at apple knows how to use a currency converter.
so if the new mac book might cost $1200 in the states, it'll cost £1200 in the UK (despite the fact that $1200 = £735).
__________________
I didn’t fight my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian…
Im sick of people saying 'dont waste paper'. If trees wanted to live, they'd all carry guns.
"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; The inherent vice of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."
root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 04:15 AM   #14
Golden Master
 
01001010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,888
Default Re: 2011 MacBook Pro - Lolfail?

Quote:
but that doesn't change the fact that if you are a pro user (like my friend is), who wants to run a lot of apps, or a lot of possibly resource intensive apps then the macbook pro possibly isn't for you.

and yes I find it laughable that his reasonably current macbook pro couldn't use safari and skype (with video) at the same time, because even the most basic PC can do that. (perhaps that's an exaggeration, but if it is, it's his exaggeration, I'm just repeating it verbatim)
...it is an exaggeration and you know it. Something is wrong with your friend's computer. No need to drag that anomaly any further. I have five Firefox windows open with multiple tabs, along with Skype and ooVoo conducting a video chat bundled with Photoshop and it all runs beautifully. I cannot fathom how you could believe that a 2010 computer could not handle such basic tasks, let alone a MacBook Pro.

Quote:
perhaps you use your mac the same as my house-mate uses his. (e.g not intensively), perhaps you're happy with it. it doesn't change the fact that I know someone who wasn't happy with a mac, (yet at the same time still liked the brand and still bought another mac to replace it).
Excuse me? I sure as hell use my MacBook Pro for intensive tasks, including (but not limited to) processing high definition video, exporting large image files and photo editing. You think I'm that daft?

Quote:
Telling me I have "absolutely no idea" what I'm talking about is just a little silly.
it also doesn't change the fact that this thread is about people saying that
putting substandard hardware in the box is silly (especially given the price tag)
substandard hardware doesn't justify a premium price tag.
you don't have to be Einstein to figure that out,
especially since I can read the specs myself and form an opinion about the hardware
You don't. You haven't owned the hardware or used the software long enough to form a constructive opinion. You're just going what others have said, which is as useless as anything in this situation. You're the type of person that focuses purely on specifications without attention paid to integration of hardware and software and that's fine. But don't make such brute statements accusing the MacBook Pro of containing "cheap netbook parts", because that's just ignorance on your part.
__________________
Stop the genocide now.
↳ www.savedarfur.org

Send comments, suggestions and criticisms.
↳ 01001010listens@gmail.com
01001010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 05:53 AM   #15
Site Team
 
root's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,999
Default Re: 2011 MacBook Pro - Lolfail?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 01001010 View Post
...it is an exaggeration and you know it.
well, all I'm going to say is that I'm the one who said first it was likely an exaggeration. (I've no vested interest in the new mac book appearing to be shit).

Quote:
Excuse me? I sure as hell use my MacBook Pro for intensive tasks, including (but not limited to) processing high definition video, exporting large image files and photo editing. You think I'm that daft?
I don't think that you're daft, I just have no idea what you use your computer for... just as you have no idea what anyone else uses their computer for...

Quote:
You don't. You haven't owned the hardware or used the software long enough to form a constructive opinion. You're just going what others have said, which is as useless as anything in this situation. You're the type of person that focuses purely on specifications without attention paid to integration of hardware and software and that's fine.
you're right, I don't own a mac. but I have used them since version 8 of Mac OS (before it ripped off BSD). -as I said in my last post.
I've used OSX, both at work, and at home. I know how well built, how solid feeling, how well integrated previous devices have been.

but that doesn't matter, we're talking about a brand new device that's only just been launched. you haven't used it yet, you have no idea how it works, how fast it is, how well built it is, whether it can justify it's price tag... where has your opinion been formed?

Quote:
But don't make such brute statements accusing the MacBook Pro of containing "cheap netbook parts", because that's just ignorance on your part.
really.

well, that's me, and darkseeker thinking that the Intel graphics just aren't premium enough to be in this device. (which is/should be a premium device).

and yes. I'm going on the specifications that have been published.
and reviews like this: Apple's new MacBook Pros raise quality concerns - Computerworld
and this 13" MacBook Pro specs leaked, reveal "Thunderbolt" I/O port
and this Apple MacBook Pro Refresh Won't Be Radical: Analyst - Desktops and Notebooks - News & Reviews - eWeek.com
and this Apple boosts MacBook Pro speeds in 'ho-hum' refresh - Computerworld

all people who have also seen the specs, people who have got the device and said things like it's a bit "ho-hum", or "not radical" or that the build quality "isn't up to much", or "poor"...

so yes, I'll go by published specs and what the people who have actually used these machines are saying. (I never met Stalin but I believe when lots of trusted sources say he wasn't a good person) -specifically avoided Godwins law!

you go with your experience of a three year old machine (2 or 3 models behind the leading model now?) and some kind of blind faith that it's going to be great because Apple made it?


Ignoring everything that's been written so far... except the first post.
do you *really* this that integrated graphics from Intel were the best choice?


I mean look at the specs. (of the 13" model)
core i5 processor -great, I'll want to pay decent money for that.
Thunder bolt, multi touch pad, HD web cam built right into the device.
wireless N networking and up to 7 hours of battery life.

these are the things (in that model) that are really great, the stuff that's setting it out as a good device that you'll want to pay good money for.
honestly. type that list, you get excited thinking how great this thing is... right until you get to the downsides.

integrated graphics? the 15 and 17" models got Radeon. why not the 13 (it's not so significantly cheaper)
and just a DVD burner... why no blu ray? (and that affects all three)

that's kind of the point I'm making here.
OSX is a decent OS, it's fast and stable.
the hardware just works.
everyone who uses a mac will tell you that "it just works", and it really really does just work...
the device spec list is half making me really excited and really want one, half making me wonder what on earth apple are on. and that if it's just a so-so, ho-hum, not radical machine then I really want it to be half the list price before I buy it.

we're talking about a laptop that I'm going to spend a thousand pounds on. (about $1500 by the time apple don't bother altering their price in link with the currency [13" model]). and for that I get just an ordinary laptop.
I can buy a dell with a core i5, and blu ray, and multi touch pad, and all of that for less money... -honestly, possibly for half the price... (not including thunder bolt because nobody else has got that yet -which makes it kind of pointless in a funny way)

lets say that I decide that the integrated graphics is really the problem...

then what? I buy the 15 or 17" version and i still just have a DVD drive, so I have a device made by apple. with a decently large display (who manufacture possibly the best and most crystal clear displays in the world) and I can't play hi-definition video on it. (well not from blu ray disk anyway).
and that 17" one carries a price tag of $2500.

it's good...
but it's just not good enough.
__________________
I didn’t fight my way to the top of the food chain to be a vegetarian…
Im sick of people saying 'dont waste paper'. If trees wanted to live, they'd all carry guns.
"The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; The inherent vice of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."
root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 10:12 AM   #16
Golden Master
 
Kage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 13,873
Send a message via MSN to Kage
Default Re: 2011 MacBook Pro - Lolfail?

I've got to stand up for Root here. The specs are certainly not worth the price they are asking, whether its been built in a solid box that looks sexy or not.
Apple is just another manufacturer. Nothing special except for the fact they know how to advertise and sell.

If you are not going to game at all on it though, then it might not be an issue, but I don't see the reason why adding some inches to the screen means they have to then add an ATI chip. They could have easily have kept that in the 13 inch model.
But they are not advertising it as a gaming machine, and it certainly isn't meant to be used for that.
__________________
Abit IP35 Pro / Q6600 G0 / Zalman 9700 / 8800GTS 640mb / 4x 2GB Corsair XMS / X-FI Xtreme M / 1x 1TB / Antec 900 / Logitech Z-5500 / Samsung 20inch
Kage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 11:54 AM   #17
Daemon Poster
 
The_Lucas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 749
Send a message via ICQ to The_Lucas Send a message via MSN to The_Lucas Send a message via Yahoo to The_Lucas
Default Re: 2011 MacBook Pro - Lolfail?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ~Darkseeker~ View Post
Reading through the specs on the 2011 Macbook pros, all looks good until you read the GPU section...

they put INTEL GRAPHICS on the 13" model? 0.o

IMHO this is one big mistake, baring in mind these things still cost £1000.
Were you aware of the AMD Radeon graphics? The Intel graphics are for energy conservation.
Apple - MacBook Pro - Technical specifications of the 15-inch model.

EDIT: lol fail I posted the wrong specs, sorry
The_Lucas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2011, 12:10 PM   #18
Golden Master
 
Kage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 13,873
Send a message via MSN to Kage
Default Re: 2011 MacBook Pro - Lolfail?

He knows about that. Only the 13 inch model has the lower grade graphics, though I wouldn't call the ATI models on offer especially high grade either
__________________
Abit IP35 Pro / Q6600 G0 / Zalman 9700 / 8800GTS 640mb / 4x 2GB Corsair XMS / X-FI Xtreme M / 1x 1TB / Antec 900 / Logitech Z-5500 / Samsung 20inch
Kage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2011, 08:03 PM   #19
Daemon Poster
 
GibsonSGKing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,384
Default Re: 2011 MacBook Pro - Lolfail?

Quote:
Originally Posted by 01001010 View Post
Their notebooks are actually pretty competitive.



1/3 the price? Doubt it, or are you speaking out of your ass?



Do you even know what a MacBook Pro is?
I wasn't just talking about Macbooks, I was talking about Apple's products in general. To me they seem way overpriced for the actual hardware you get, especially when you consider how closed their OS's seem to be. It just seems to be a bunch of snazzy advertising in my opinion.
__________________
C2Q Q9400 @ 3.2GHZ | Zalman 9900 LED HeatSink | Asus P5E3 Pro Motherboard | CM Storm Scout case | 1TB Caviar Black HDD | GTX760 4GB | 23" Acer [1920x1080] & 21.6" Asus [1920x1080] monitors
GibsonSGKing is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2011, 08:51 PM   #20
Golden Master
 
Cabbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,912
Send a message via AIM to Cabbs
Default Re: 2011 MacBook Pro - Lolfail?

Does anyone besides Apple offer IPS panels with their laptops? Those are considerably more expensive to make than TN film screens.
__________________

__________________
=Like anime? Come to AnimeAppeal.com!=
||DFI UT P35||Q9550@3400 Mhz||Geil 4GB RAM||Radeon 5770||
Cabbs is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0