Draygoes:
I don't know if i agree fully on that. But then again. My knowledge about guns are not more than the average person.
It just seam to me like a weapon that can quickly fire multiple rounds against a target would be better. I just suspect that skills are less needed when you have 30 bullets in a magazine and a hold to fire trigger.
Note: When i say less skill is needed i mean in comparison to a pistol. I am well aware that skills with a weapon make all the difference in a fire fight.
I have to agree with Dray. When you account the fact that when you have a full auto, the action is Recoil driven, meaning it needs a lot of recoil to open the action, eject the shell, and chamber a new one. Automatic weapons are very inefficient and very inaccurate for that reason. Honestly, a semi auto or burst is more effective than full auto. And, I've noticed that in police fire fights, most of the fights are done with handguns and auto weapons. The auto weapons having a less hit ratio for the recoil reason I gave.
Going off what he said, yes a full auto will have more jams than a semi auto because most semi-auto's are gas driven/recoil driven, and most semi autos have a lighter recoil spring so not as much recoil is used, therefore making the shooter better at keeping on target.
As you can notice, I deem myself as a bit of a firearm expert
---------- Post added at 09:42 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:40 PM ----------
YoungIT:
I don't find it that surprising.
The I3 is better than what people gives it credit for, and when it comes to gaming (as i am sure you already know) a good GPU is MUCH more important that a good CPU.
See I would love to have spent $150 on an i3 4370 vs. $250 on an i5 4690K. My question is, should I have gotten the i3 for playing stuff like DayZ, and Far Cry 4? or was my i5 move a good one?